P I Lira1, A Ashworth, S S Morris. 1. Centre for Human Nutrition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare morbidity and mortality rates of low birth weight (LBW) and appropriate birth weight infants born at term, focusing on diarrheal and respiratory infections. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 133 LBW infants (1500 to 2499 gm) and 260 appropriate birth weight infants (3000 to 3499 gm), individually matched by sex and season of birth, were followed for the first 6 months of life. None had congenital anomalies and all were from poor families living in the interior of Pernambuco, northeast Brazil. Data on infant deaths, hospitalizations, and morbidity were collected prospectively through daily home visits (except Sundays) from birth through week 8, then twice weekly for weeks 9 to 26. The effects of birth weight were assessed with a variety of multivariable techniques, controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Of the LBW infants, 56% were wasted (thin), 23% were stunted, and 17% were both wasted and stunted. The LBW infants (median 2380 gm) experienced a sevenfold higher mortality rate and fourfold higher rate of hospitalization than appropriate birth weight infants. Almost all deaths and hospitalizations were in the postneonatal period. The LBW infants also experienced 33% more days with diarrhea and 32% more days with vomiting (p = 0.003 in each case). The prevalences of cough and fever were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Infant deaths, hospitalizations, and diarrheal morbidity are increased in term LBW infants who have only a modest weight deficit.
OBJECTIVE: To compare morbidity and mortality rates of low birth weight (LBW) and appropriate birth weight infants born at term, focusing on diarrheal and respiratory infections. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 133 LBW infants (1500 to 2499 gm) and 260 appropriate birth weight infants (3000 to 3499 gm), individually matched by sex and season of birth, were followed for the first 6 months of life. None had congenital anomalies and all were from poor families living in the interior of Pernambuco, northeast Brazil. Data on infant deaths, hospitalizations, and morbidity were collected prospectively through daily home visits (except Sundays) from birth through week 8, then twice weekly for weeks 9 to 26. The effects of birth weight were assessed with a variety of multivariable techniques, controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Of the LBW infants, 56% were wasted (thin), 23% were stunted, and 17% were both wasted and stunted. The LBW infants (median 2380 gm) experienced a sevenfold higher mortality rate and fourfold higher rate of hospitalization than appropriate birth weight infants. Almost all deaths and hospitalizations were in the postneonatal period. The LBW infants also experienced 33% more days with diarrhea and 32% more days with vomiting (p = 0.003 in each case). The prevalences of cough and fever were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS:Infant deaths, hospitalizations, and diarrheal morbidity are increased in term LBW infants who have only a modest weight deficit.
Entities:
Keywords:
Age Factors; Americas; Biology; Birth Weight; Body Weight; Brazil; Case Control Studies; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Diarrhea; Diseases; Economic Factors; Infant; Infections; Ingredients And Chemicals; Inorganic Chemicals; Latin America; Low Birth Weight; Low Income Population; Malnutrition; Metals; Mortality; Nutrition Disorders; Physiology; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Respiratory Infections; Social Class; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; South America; Studies; Youth; Zinc--administraction and dosage
Authors: Rosemary de Jesus Machado Amorim; Alexsandra Ferreira da Costa Coelho; Pedro Israel Cabral de Lira; Marilia de Carvalho Lima Journal: Breastfeed Med Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Rosemary de Jesus Machado Amorim; Marilia de Carvalho Lima; Pedro Israel Cabral de Lira; Alan Martin Emond Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Lisa M Thompson; Nigel Bruce; Brenda Eskenazi; Anaite Diaz; Daniel Pope; Kirk R Smith Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Girmay Medhin; Charlotte Hanlon; Michael Dewey; Atalay Alem; Fikru Tesfaye; Bogale Worku; Mark Tomlinson; Martin Prince Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 3.295