Literature DB >> 8618132

Probiotics, cecal microflora, and aberrant crypts in the rat colon.

D D Gallaher1, W H Stallings, L L Blessing, F F Busta, L J Brady.   

Abstract

Our hypothesis was that administration of bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus acidophilus or both to rats will minimize the numbers of aberrant crypts in the distal colon that develop in response to the carcinogen 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH). A series of experiments was designed to test this hypothesis where the treatments used were as follows: skim milk controls (Skim-Basal), skim milk + bifidobacteria (Bifido-Basal), skim milk + fructooligosaccharide (Skim-FOS), and skim milk + bifidobacteria + fructooligosaccharide (Bifido-FOS). In two experiments, bifido-bacteria + FOS administration significantly decreased the number of aberrant crypts that developed, but there was no clear relationship of aberrant crypts to numbers of bifidobacteria or Clostridium perfringens. In the third experiment, the Bifido-FOS treatment led to significantly fewer aberrant crypts and aberrant crypt foci than the Bifido-Basal treatment. The Skim-FOS group had significantly more cecal bifidobacteria than the Skim-Basal group and significantly fewer C. perfringens than the Skim-Basal and Bifido-Basal. In a fourth experiment, L. acidophilus was added as an additional treatment. The number of aberrant crypts was not significantly different among the groups. However, the number of C. perfringens was significantly decreased by the addition of bifidobacteria, L. acidophilus or the combination of the two, whereas the numbers of bifidobacteria and L. acidophilus were not affected by treatment. A significant correlation (R2 = 0.84, P < 0.01) was noted between the body weight of rats at DMH administration and the magnitude of the difference in aberrant crypts between the Skim-Basal rats and the Bifido-FOS rats. The results suggest that there is variability in the effects of bifidobacteria and L. acidophilus administration on both aberrant crypt formation and C. perfringens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8618132     DOI: 10.1093/jn/126.5.1362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  4 in total

1.  Effect of synbiotics on intestinal microflora and digestive enzyme activities in rats.

Authors:  Suh-Ching Yang; Ju-Yen Chen; Huey-Fang Shang; Ting-Ying Cheng; Su Chen Tsou; Jiun-Rong Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  The intestinal microbiota, gastrointestinal environment and colorectal cancer: a putative role for probiotics in prevention of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  M Andrea Azcárate-Peril; Michael Sikes; José M Bruno-Bárcena
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Inhibition of tumor progression and neoangiogenesis using cyclic RGD-peptides in a chemically induced colon carcinoma in rats.

Authors:  Jörg Haier; Ulrike Goldmann; Birgit Hotz; Norbert Runkel; Ulrich Keilholz
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Protease and hemicellulase assisted extraction of dietary fiber from wastes of Cynara cardunculus.

Authors:  Cinthia Santo Domingo; Marcelo Soria; Ana M Rojas; Eliana N Fissore; Lía N Gerschenson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.