Literature DB >> 8617153

Brain-stem trigeminal and auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: physiological insights.

J F Soustiel1, H Hafner, A V Chistyakov, D Yarnitzky, B Sharf, J N Guilburd, M Feinsod.   

Abstract

Thirty-six patients with multiple sclerosis were evaluated by means of brain-stem trigeminal and auditory evoked potentials. The brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) were abnormal in 26 patients (72.2%). Brain-stem trigeminal evoked potentials (BTEPs) yielded similar results, showing distorted waveforms and/or prolonged latencies in 25 patients (69.4%). As expected, the MRI proved to be the most efficient single test, revealing plaques in 86.4% of the patients evaluated. However, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI was lower than that provided by the combination of the BTEP and BAEP (88.9%). Moreover, in patients having signs of brain-stem involvement, the BTEP, alone and in combination with the BAEP, proved to be more sensitive than the MRI in revealing brain-stem lesions. Correlation between clinical and BTEP findings could be found only in those patients who presented with signs of trigeminal involvement such as trigeminal neuralgia or dysesthesiae. The analysis of the BTEP waveforms showed two distinct types of abnormality-a peripheral type and a central type-suggesting plaques in distinct locations. Both the BTEP and the BAEP demonstrated a correlation with the clinical course of the disease and the condition of the patient at the time of the evaluation. Relapse of the disease was associated with a marked prolongation of the central conduction time in the BTEP and in the BAEP, suggesting the application of such studies to the monitoring of unstable patients in the evaluation of new therapeutic protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8617153     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00172-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  6 in total

1.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Neurophysiological markers.

Authors:  Letizia Leocani; Giancarlo Comi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Auditory evaluation in Parkinsonian patients.

Authors:  Süleyman Yýlmaz; Elif Karalý; Abdurrahman Tokmak; Ender Güçlü; Abdulkadir Koçer; Ozcan Oztürk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Risk of Ear-Associated Diseases After Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture.

Authors:  Chao-Chih Yang; Chih-Jaan Tai; Sou-Hsin Chien; Cheng-Li Lin; Shih-Ni Chang; Fung-Chang Sung; Chi-Jung Chung; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-02-13

5.  Tongue somatosensory evoked potentials reflect midbrain involvement in patients with clinically isolated syndrome.

Authors:  Magdalena Krbot Skorić; Ivan Adamec; Luka Crnošija; Tereza Gabelić; Barbara Barun; Ivana Zadro; Silva Butković Soldo; Mario Habek
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  Evolution of tongue somatosensory evoked potentials in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Magdalena Krbot Skorić; Luka Crnošija; Berislav Ruška; Tereza Gabelić; Barbara Barun; Ivan Adamec; Mario Habek
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.339

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.