Literature DB >> 8617041

The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions.

H C Burrell1, S E Pinder, A R Wilson, A J Evans, L J Yeoman, C W Elston, I O Ellis.   

Abstract

The sensitivity of mammography in cancer detection needs to be high but is also important to achieve a high diagnostic specificity to avoid the morbidity associated with unnecessary surgical biopsy. We have reviewed the mammographic features of non-palpable breast lesions to identify factors which may improve the specificity of mammographic interpretation and reduce the number of open surgical biopsies for benign lesions. Four hundred and twenty-five surgical biopsies of non-palpable breast lesions were performed following image-guided localization between January 1987 and April 1994. The mammographic features of these lesions were reviewed and correlated with their histology. Two hundred and twenty-five of the excised lesions were malignant and 200 were benign giving a benign to malignant ratio of 0.88:1 and a positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy of 53%. Pre-operative fine needle aspiration cytology was performed in 359 cases (84%). The PPV for the various mammographic abnormalities following the assessment process ranged from 4% for well defined masses to 94% for spiculate masses. The PPV for all microcalcifications was 45%. For impalpable lesions it is our policy to recommend surgical excision of all spiculate masses, parenchymal deformities and high risk microcalcifications. Ill defined masses are managed according to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and/or core biopsy results. Masses which are entirely well-defined are regarded as benign and are not recalled for assessment unless they are new or enlarging. Needle core biopsy has been added to our preoperative assessment of mammographically indeterminate microcalcifications with the aim of reducing the number of benign surgical biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8617041     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80346-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  16 in total

1.  Changes in Benign to Malignant Ratio of Surgically Treated Breast Diseases in a District Hospital.

Authors:  Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  An interactive system for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Lihua Li; Wei Liu; Weidong Xu; Dror Lederman; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  HER2/neu protein expression and fine needle breast aspiration from Argentinean patients with non-palpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Wendy Gabriela Domínguez; Héctor Nardi; Héctor Montero; Esteban Vincent; María Marta Corte; Gabriela Andrea Balogh
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Breast cancer risk prediction model: a nomogram based on common mammographic screening findings.

Authors:  J M H Timmers; A L M Verbeek; J IntHout; R M Pijnappel; M J M Broeders; G J den Heeten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Lockdown of Breast Cancer Screening for COVID-19: Possible Scenario.

Authors:  Gianluca Vanni; Marco Pellicciaro; Marco Materazzo; Valentina Bruno; Chiara Oldani; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Chiara Buonomo; Jonathan Caspi; Paola Gualtieri; Agostino Chiaravalloti; Leonardo Palombi; Emilio Piccione; Oreste Claudio Buonomo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables.

Authors:  Aruna Venkatesan; Philip Chu; Karla Kerlikowske; Edward A Sickles; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Initiative to Improve Mammogram Interpretation.

Authors:  Kim A Adcock
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2004

9.  Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases.

Authors:  G Farshid; T Sullivan; P Downey; P G Gill; S Pieterse
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Chris J Rose; John C Waterton; Richard A D Carano; Geoff J M Parker; Alan Jackson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.