Literature DB >> 8616650

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a computer assisted cost-utility analysis.

A S St Leger1, M Spencely, C N McCollum, M Mossa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of introducing routine ultrasonic screening for the identification and elective surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) at high risk of rupture in the U.K. population of men aged 65-74 years.
DESIGN: A computer assisted simulation of an AAA screening programme. The simulation incorporated assumptions gleaned from the literature about the epidemiology of AAA and the costs of screening. In addition, up-to-date costings based on recent Manchester (U.K.) vascular surgery experience are used.
SETTING: A dialogue between National Health Service commissioners and providers to explore the feasibility and desirability of introducing AAA screening. CHIEF OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. MAIN
RESULTS: The absolute cost (circa 1992/3) per QALY gained from screening for and treating aneurysms of > or = 6 cm in diameter of pounds 1500 (benefit not discounted). Offsetting current treatment costs of ruptured aneurysms gives a net additional cost per QALY of pounds 1300. Screening and treating aneurysms of > or = 5 cm leads to a cost per QALY gained exceeding pounds 20000. The findings are robust under sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine screening for AAAs of size > or = 6 cm compares favourably in terms of cost per QALY gained with services such as breast and cervical cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8616650     DOI: 10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80049-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  7 in total

1.  The case against a national screening programme for aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  B Heather; J Earnshaw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Looking for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  F A Lederle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The case against a national screening programme for aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  B Heather; J Earnshaw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): cost-effectiveness of screening, surveillance of intermediate-sized AAA, and management of symptomatic AAA.

Authors:  Marc D Silverstein; Stephen R Pitts; Elliot L Chaikof; David J Ballard
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

5.  Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-16

6.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men: a Canadian perspective using Monte Carlo-based estimates.

Authors:  Bernard Montreuil; James Brophy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Evidence for association between the HLA-DQA locus and abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Belgian population: a case control study.

Authors:  Toru Ogata; Lucie Gregoire; Katrina A B Goddard; Magdalena Skunca; Gerard Tromp; Wayne D Lancaster; Antonio R Parrado; Qing Lu; Hidenori Shibamura; Natzi Sakalihasan; Raymond Limet; Gerald L MacKean; Claudette Arthur; Taijiro Sueda; Helena Kuivaniemi
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 2.103

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.