Literature DB >> 8616075

Plateau phase in multiple myeloma: an analysis of long-term follow-up of 432 patients. Finnish Leukaemia Group.

T M Oivanen1.   

Abstract

DAta from an 8-year follow-up of 432 myeloma patients were analysed for incidence, duration and prognostic value of plateau phase and factors favouring its achievement. The first-line chemotherapy was melphalan and prednisolone in 121 cases, combination chemotherapy in 311 cases. The survival times were similar despite different response rates. Any response resulted in survival significantly (P<0.001) better than in patients with progressive disease, but the level of response had no influence in this respect. A plateau of at least 3 months was achieved in 81%, at least 6 months in 74%, at least 12 months in 59% and at least 24 months in 33%. Groups with significantly different (P<0.001) survivals were identified: a plateau of <3 months, 3-11 months, 12-23 months, and 24 months or longer, with median survivals of 10, 27, 46 and 81 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of pretreatment variables, only haemoglobin (Hb) (P<0.001) and creatinine at 2 months (P<0.01) were significant for a plateau >12 months. After inclusion of chemotherapy data, Hb and time taken to reach the best response were still significant (P=0.002). The predictive power of high Hb and slow response for achieving a plateau of 6 or 12 months was 79%. Accordingly, the criteria for response of treatment for multiple myeloma should include a stable period of at least 3 months; the criteria for a plateau a stable period of at least 12 months in order to have real prognostic significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8616075     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.413952.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  4 in total

1.  Posttreatment nadir M-protein level is a stronger discriminator of survival following plateau attainment than is percent reduction in M-protein in patients with IgG myeloma.

Authors:  K Shimizu; E Nagura; N Hirabayashi; A Wakita; H Takeyama; H Sao; M Nitta; K Kawashima; H Saito
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  Role of hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor c-met in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  C Seidel; M Børset; H Hjorth-Hansen; A Sundan; A Waage
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Management of renal dysfunction in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sandeep R Pandit; David H Vesole
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-06

Review 4.  Relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Pandit; D H Vesole
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2001-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.