OBJECTIVE: Patients with mixed or manic bipolar disorder were studied to determine whether suicidality in mania is associated with increasing depression in general (i.e., a dimensional construct based on symptom severity) or with the presence of a mixed state per se (i.e., a categorical construct requiring the presence of a full depressive syndrome). METHOD: Diagnostic (categorical) assessments of 91 consecutively hospitalized patients with DSM-III-R mixed or manic bipolar disorder were made by using the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Symptom (dimensional) assessments were made by using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Young Mania Rating Scale, and the Scale of the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. Logistic regression models were employed to test the relative associations between suicidality and dimensional and categorical depression measures. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to identify a potential threshold depression rating that predicted suicidality. RESULTS: Suicidality was more common in mixed than manic bipolar disorder. However, when adjusted for total depression scores, this association with affective state did not persist, but the statistical model significantly improved. In the improved model, depressive symptom ratings were significantly associated with suicidality. Hamilton depression scale ratings greater than 18 identified over 90% of the patients with suicidality, although there was also a high rate of false positives (32%). CONCLUSIONS: It is the severity of concurrent depressive symptoms in mania, rather than the presence of a depressive syndrome per se (i.e., mixed state), that is associated with suicidality in bipolar patients.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with mixed or manic bipolar disorder were studied to determine whether suicidality in mania is associated with increasing depression in general (i.e., a dimensional construct based on symptom severity) or with the presence of a mixed state per se (i.e., a categorical construct requiring the presence of a full depressive syndrome). METHOD: Diagnostic (categorical) assessments of 91 consecutively hospitalized patients with DSM-III-R mixed or manic bipolar disorder were made by using the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Symptom (dimensional) assessments were made by using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Young Mania Rating Scale, and the Scale of the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. Logistic regression models were employed to test the relative associations between suicidality and dimensional and categorical depression measures. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to identify a potential threshold depression rating that predicted suicidality. RESULTS: Suicidality was more common in mixed than manic bipolar disorder. However, when adjusted for total depression scores, this association with affective state did not persist, but the statistical model significantly improved. In the improved model, depressive symptom ratings were significantly associated with suicidality. Hamilton depression scale ratings greater than 18 identified over 90% of the patients with suicidality, although there was also a high rate of false positives (32%). CONCLUSIONS: It is the severity of concurrent depressive symptoms in mania, rather than the presence of a depressive syndrome per se (i.e., mixed state), that is associated with suicidality in bipolarpatients.
Authors: Guilherme Borges; Jules Angst; Matthew K Nock; Ayelet Meron Ruscio; Ellen E Walters; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Mario Cruz; Harold Alan Pincus; Deborah E Welsh; Devra Greenwald; Elaine Lasky; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Cheryl A Chessick; Deborah A Perlick; David J Miklowitz; L Miriam Dickinson; Michael H Allen; Chad D Morris; Jodi M Gonzalez; Lauren B Marangell; Victoria Cosgrove; Michael Ostacher Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Lauren B Marangell; Ellen B Dennehy; Sachiko Miyahara; Stephen R Wisniewski; Mark S Bauer; Mark Hyman Rapaport; Michael H Allen Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 4.839