Literature DB >> 8614335

Sequential continuity of care by general practitioners: which patients change doctor?

L S Pilotto1, J McCallum, C Raymond, C McGilchrist, B M Veale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify individual and social characteristics of patients making sequential visits to a different rather than the same general practitioner (GP).
METHOD: Data for this study were extracted from the "Record Linkage Pilot Study" of the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, which linked information from personal interviews with Health Insurance Commission and National Heart Foundation Risk Factor Survey data. Each sequence of visits (any two consecutive visits) made by each participant to the same or a different GP from January 1991 to December 1992 was treated as an event. PARTICIPANTS: 521 subjects aged between 23 and 72 years who gave consent to release of Health Insurance Commission data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A visit to the same GP or a different GP from the one seen at the last visit.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that younger age, good physical functioning, good self-rated health, normal body mass index, shiftwork and a longer time interval between visits were significantly associated with less continuity of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study raises questions about the relationship between chronological continuity and quality of care. For example, if infrequent visits (associated with less continuity) are for distinct illnesses, is quality of care affected by information or treatment from a previous visit? Our results also suggest that some GPs, because of the demography of their practices (more young people, a higher proportion of shift workers), may be disadvantaged by continuity-based reward systems. Moreover, because of lack of continuity young people may miss out on GPs' health promotional activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8614335     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb122121.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

1.  Frequent attenders' consulting patterns with general practitioners.

Authors:  R D Neal; P L Heywood; S Morley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Continuity of care in primary care and association with survival in older people: a 17-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Otto R Maarsingh; Ykeda Henry; Peter M van de Ven; Dorly Jh Deeg
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Something in nothing: negative space in the clinician-patient relationship.

Authors:  Stephen A Buetow
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care.

Authors:  John W Saultz
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 5.  Towards a theory of continuity of care.

Authors:  Denis Pereira Gray; Philip Evans; Kieran Sweeney; Pamela Lings; David Seamark; Clare Seamark; Michael Dixon; Nicholas Bradley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Inequality in provider continuity for children by Australian general practitioners.

Authors:  Marjan Kljakovic; Karen Ciszek; Graham Reynolds; Samuel Colman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Association between continuity of care and long-term mortality in Taiwanese first-ever stroke survivors: An 8-year cohort study.

Authors:  Chun-Pai Yang; Hao-Min Cheng; Mei-Chun Lu; Hui-Chu Lang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.