Literature DB >> 8614170

Comorbidity-adjusted complication risk: a new outcome quality measure.

D J Brailer1, E Kroch, M V Pauly, J Huang.   

Abstract

The measurement of inpatient complications his received substantial attention in recent years because mortality rates and other outcome measures often appear unable to discriminate superior from inferior hospital care. Complication measurement holds out the promise of being more sensitive to variations in patient care because complications occur more frequently than do mortalities, and because complications are more direct consequences of the process of care. The authors developed a new measure of complications that seeks to give insight into the patient care given by different hospitals or physicians by using commonly available data. Specifically, this measure is based on a decision-theoretic model that estimates the probability of a complication for combinations of admitting and secondary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnoses. The measure can be evaluated at the patient level, or aggregated and risk-adjusted for the population of a given care provider (eg, physician or hospital). When applied to a set of patient-level UB- 82/92 data, this measure estimates the risk of complication for any member of a population, controlling for comorbidity, and hence is designated comorbidity-adjusted complication risk (CACR). The authors describe the development of CACR and its testing and validation using data acquired from the states of Pennsylvania, California, and Florida, as well as facility data obtained directly from hospitals. The data set includes 480,000 patients from 50 Pennsylvania hospitals, 300,000 patients from 33 Florida hospitals, 370,000 patients from 35 California hospitals, and 37,000 patients from six validation hospitals. Comorbidity-adjusted complication risk is constructed from widely available data common to most patient cases. Comorbidity-adjusted complication risk can be adjusted for its case mix, but such risk adjustment has much less effect on CACR than on other adverse outcomes such as mortality and morbidity. Comorbidity-adjusted complication risk varies widely across the hospitals in this sample, yet it is stable across time and is correlated with other known quality outcomes, including such accepted "gold standards" as hospital-documented adverse event rates and chart review determinations of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8614170     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199605000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  Member risk adjustment for ambulatory episodes of care.

Authors:  D J Brailer; E A Kroch
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1999-07

2.  How safe is primary knee replacement surgery? Perioperative complication rates in Northern Illinois, 1993-1999.

Authors:  Joe Feinglass; Hagay Amir; Patricia Taylor; Ithai Lurie; Larry M Manheim; Rowland W Chang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-02-15

3.  Coding for quality measurement: the relationship between hospital structural characteristics and coding accuracy from the perspective of quality measurement.

Authors:  Pavani Rangachari
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2007-04-16

4.  Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool?

Authors:  P S Romano; B K Chan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Reoperation as a quality indicator in colorectal surgery: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Arden M Morris; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Barbara Matthews; Jason A Dominitz; William E Barlow; Sharon A Dobie; Kevin G Billingsley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Constructs of burden of illness in older patients with breast cancer: a comparison of measurement methods.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; A S Bierman; K Gold; Y Zhang; J H Ng; N Maserejian; N Maserejan; Y T Hwang; N J Meropol; J Hadley; R A Silliman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Sex differences in hospital readmission among colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Juan Ramon González; Esteve Fernandez; Víctor Moreno; Josepa Ribes; Mercè Peris; Matilde Navarro; Maria Cambray; Josep Maria Borràs
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Postoperative radiotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; Ethan A Halm; Marcelo Bonomi; Cardinale Smith; Grace Mhango; Emilia Bagiella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Survival and risk of adverse events in older patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stages II-IIIA lung cancer: observational cohort study.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; Cardinale B Smith; Stuart Packer; Gary M Strauss; Linda Lurslurchachai; Alex Federman; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-14

10.  Identifying potentially preventable complications using a present on admission indicator.

Authors:  John S Hughes; Richard F Averill; Norbert I Goldfield; James C Gay; John Muldoon; Elizabeth McCullough; Jean Xiang
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2006
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.