Literature DB >> 8614043

The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure of intrapulmonary shunt and ventilatory deadspace in nonhypoxic trauma patients.

A R Vigil1, F W Clevenger.   

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the routine use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated patients. We hypothesized that nonhypoxic patients receiving 5-cm H2O PEEP would have improved shunt and PaO2/F10(2) ratios (P/F), without an increased dead space to tidal volume ratio (VD/VT) versus patients receiving no PEEP. Forty-four trauma patients were randomized to receive 5-cm H2O PEEP (PEEP) or 0-cm H2O PEEP (ZEEP). Shunt VD/VT and P/F were measured at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after intubation and after extubation. PEEP and ZEEP comparisons used Student's t test and the General Linear Models procedure. Shunt was significantly increased at t = 0 and at extubation in the PEEP group. At extubation, the PEEP group demonstrated significantly higher VD/VT and poorer P/F ratios. After correction for baseline values, no statistically significant differences were noted in spite of a trend toward worsening pulmonary function in all measured parameters. These results suggest that routine use of 5-cm H2O PEEP in mechanical ventilated trauma patients is not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8614043     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199604000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  4 in total

1.  Prophylactic positive end-expiratory pressure and postintubation hemodynamics: an interventional, randomized study.

Authors:  Olivier Lesur; Marie-Anaïs Remillard; Catherine St-Pierre; Simon Falardeau
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.409

2.  Associations between positive end-expiratory pressure and outcome of patients without ARDS at onset of ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ary Serpa Neto; Roberto Rabello Filho; Thomas Cherpanath; Rogier Determann; Dave A Dongelmans; Frederique Paulus; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 6.925

3.  RELAx - REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna Geke Algera; Luigi Pisani; Dennis C J Bergmans; Sylvia den Boer; Corianne A J de Borgie; Frank H Bosch; Karina Bruin; Thomas G Cherpanath; Rogier M Determann; Arjen M Dondorp; Dave A Dongelmans; Henrik Endeman; Jasper J Haringman; Janneke Horn; Nicole P Juffermans; David M van Meenen; Nardo J van der Meer; Maruschka P Merkus; Hazra S Moeniralam; Ilse Purmer; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Mathilde Slabbekoorn; Peter E Spronk; Alexander P J Vlaar; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Ary Serpa Neto; Marcus J Schultz; Frederique Paulus
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Tommaso Pettenuzzo; Annalisa Boscolo; Alessandro De Cassai; Nicolò Sella; Francesco Zarantonello; Paolo Persona; Laura Pasin; Giovanni Landoni; Paolo Navalesi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.