Literature DB >> 8613801

The interaction of imposed and inherent olfactory mucosal activity patterns and their composite representation in a mammalian species using voltage-sensitive dyes.

P F Kent1, M M Mozell, S J Murphy, D E Hornung.   

Abstract

From amphibian data, two mechanisms that could underlie the encoding of odorants by the mucosal activity patterns they engender are as follows (1) receptors with similar odorant selectivities could be aggregated spatially on the mucosa (inherent patterns); (2) in analogy to gas chromatography, as odorants are drawn along the surface of the mucosa the strongly sorbed ones could be deposited preferentially upstream, whereas the weakly sorbed ones could be distributed more evenly (imposed patterns). Do both of these possible coding mechanisms operate in mammals and, if so, how do they interact in giving composite patterns (imposed + inherent)? Fluorescence changes in di-4-ANEPPS applied to rat mucosas were monitored by a 10 x 10 pixel photodiode array. To observe the inherent patterns, three odorants of varying sorbabilities first were puffed uniformly onto the entire mucosa mounted in a Delrin chamber. To bring out the imposed patterns, the chamber was then sealed to replicate anatomically the rat's nasal cavity, and these same odorants were drawn at three flow rates along the mucosal flow path. The results demonstrated for the first time the existence of imposed patterns in a mammal. The strongly sorbed odorants, unlike the weakly sorbed one, showed marked imposed patterns. Within physiological limits, increasing the flow rate decreased the magnitude of the imposed patterns. One might consider strategies that the olfactory process could use either to negate or to take advantage of the chromatographic effect, because the lability of the composite patterns with changing stimulus conditions raises questions about their role in odorant encoding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8613801      PMCID: PMC6578725     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  27 in total

1.  Chemical determinants of the rat electro-olfactogram.

Authors:  J W Scott; T Brierley; F H Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons.

Authors:  M Ma; G M Shepherd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Functional organization of sensory input to the olfactory bulb glomerulus analyzed by two-photon calcium imaging.

Authors:  Matt Wachowiak; Winfried Denk; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Effects of concentration and sniff flow rate on the rat electroolfactogram.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Hartwig Spors; Matt Wachowiak; Lawrence B Cohen; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Odorants with multiple oxygen-containing functional groups and other odorants with high water solubility preferentially activate posterior olfactory bulb glomeruli.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Spart Arguello; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  A method for generating natural and user-defined sniffing patterns in anesthetized or reduced preparations.

Authors:  Man Ching Cheung; Ryan M Carey; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 9.  Neural computations with mammalian infochemicals.

Authors:  A Gelperin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Why sniff fast? The relationship between sniff frequency, odor discrimination, and receptor neuron activation in the rat.

Authors:  Daniel W Wesson; Justus V Verhagen; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.