Literature DB >> 8613604

Meta-analysis of intravenous dipyridamole-thallium-201 imaging (1985 to 1994) and dobutamine echocardiography (1991 to 1994) for risk stratification before vascular surgery.

L J Shaw1, K A Eagle, B J Gersh, D D Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the prognostic value of abnormal test results with pharmacologic stress with regard to perioperative and long-term outcomes in a large population of candidates for vascular surgery.
BACKGROUND: Although numerous studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of dipyridamole-thallium-201 myocardial perfusion and dobutamine echocardiography in vascular surgery candidates, a synopsis of predictive estimates is difficult because of individual study variability in pretest clinical risk, sample size and study design.
METHODS: A systematic review of published reports on preoperative pharmacologic stress risk stratification from the MEDLINE data base (1985 to 1994) identified 10 reports on dipyridamole-thallium-201 myocardial perfusion (1,994 patients) and 5 on dobutamine stress echocardiography (446 patients). Random effects models were used to calculate summary odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Summary odds ratios for death or myocardial infarction and secondary cardiac end points were greater for dobutamine echocardiographic dyssynergy (14- to 27-fold) than for dipyridamole-thallium-201 redistribution (4-fold); wider confidence intervals were noted with dobutamine echocardiography. Pretest coronary disease probability was correlated with the positive predictive value of a reversible thallium-201 defect (r=0.70), increasing sixfold from low to high risk patient subsets. Cardiac event rates were low in patients without a history of coronary artery disease (1% in 176 patients) compared with patients with coronary disease and a normal or fixed-defect pattern (4.8% in 83 patients) and one or more thallium-201 redistribution abnormality (18.6% in 97 patients, p=0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of 15 studies demonstrated that the prognostic value of noninvasive stress imaging abnormalities for perioperative ischemic events is comparable between available techniques but that the accuracy varies with coronary artery disease prevalence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8613604     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00549-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  21 in total

1.  Volatility in the diagnostic markets: is there a "new economy" of testing?

Authors:  D D Miller; L J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Advances in nuclear cardiology: preoperative risk stratification.

Authors:  Kenneth A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The role of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Brian G Abbott; Timothy M Bateman; Ron Blankstein; Dennis A Calnon; Jeffrey A Leppo; Jamshid Maddahi; Matthew M Schumaecker; Leslee J Shaw; R Parker Ward; David G Wolinsky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Correlation between clinical outcomes and appropriateness grading for referral to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Angela S Koh; Jennifer L S Flores; Felix Y J Keng; Ru San Tan; Terrance S J Chua
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Preoperative cardiac testing before major vascular surgery.

Authors:  Sanne E Hoeks; Olaf Schouten; Maureen J van der Vlugt; Don Poldermans
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  The question: to test or not to test in preoperative cardiac risk evaluation.

Authors:  J A Leppo; S T Dahlberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on noncardiac surgery: Cardiovascular assessment and management : Are the differences clinically relevant? The European perspective.

Authors:  Steen D Kristensen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Value of absence of a transient myocardial perfusion defect during stress myocardial perfusion study in patients undergoing major vascular surgery.

Authors:  Jaafer A Golzar; Assad Movahed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  3rd Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Pai Ching Yu; Bruno Caramelli; André Coelho Marques; Daniela Calderaro; Luciana Savoy Fornari; Claudio Pinho; Alina Coutinho Rodrigues Feitosa; Carisi Anne Polanczyk; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Carlos Jardim; Carolina L Z Vieira; Debora Y M Nakamura; Denise Iezzi; Dirk Schreen; Eduardo Leal Adam; Elbio Antonio D'Amico; Emerson Q de Lima; Emmanuel de Almeida Burdmann; Enrique Indalecio Pachón Mateo; Fabiana Goulart Marcondes Braga; Fabio S Machado; Flavio J de Paula; Gabriel Assis Lopes do Carmo; Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; Gustavo Faibischew Prado; Heno Ferreira Lopes; João R C Fernandes; José J G de Lima; Luciana Sacilotto; Luciano Ferreira Drager; Luciano Janussi Vacanti; Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde; Luis F L Prada; Luis Henrique Wolff Gowdak; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Maristela Camargo Monachini; Milena Frota Macatrão-Costa; Milena Ribeiro Paixão; Mucio Tavares de Oliveira; Patricia Cury; Paula R Villaça; Pedro Silvio Farsky; Rinaldo F Siciliano; Roberto Henrique Heinisch; Rogerio Souza; Sandra F M Gualandro; Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi; Wilson Mathias
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.