Literature DB >> 8612960

Heterochrony and the phylotypic period.

M K Richardson1.   

Abstract

There has been a resurgence of interest in comparative embryology. It is now important to be able to compare gene expression in different species at similar developmental stages. One phenomenon which may make it difficult to compare embryos in this way is heterochrony--a change in developmental timing during evolution. It is not clear whether heterochrony can affect the intermediate stages of embryonic development, when many important genes involved in pattern formation are expressed. A prevalent view is that these so-called phylotypic stages are resistant to evolutionary change because they are when the body plan is laid down. Haeckel's famous drawings, which show different vertebrates developing from virtually identical somite-stage embryos, are still used to support this idea. I have reexamined the morphological data relating to developmental timing in somite-stage embryos. The data reveal striking patterns of heterochrony during vertebrate evolution. These shifts in developmental timing have strongly affected the phylotypic stage, which is therefore poorly conserved and is more appropriately described as the phylotypic period. This is contrary to the impression created by Haeckel's drawings, which I show to be inaccurate and misleading. The study of gene expression in embryos which show heterochrony could give important insights into evolutionary and developmental mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8612960     DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1995.8041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  33 in total

Review 1.  Early development of the neural plate, neural crest and facial region of marsupials.

Authors:  K K Smith
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Inverting the hourglass: quantitative evidence against the phylotypic stage in vertebrate development.

Authors:  Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds; Jonathan E Jeffery; Michael K Richardson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The phylotypic stage as a boundary of modular memory: non mechanistic perspective.

Authors:  Jana Svorcová
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 1.919

4.  Physics and the canalization of morphogenesis: a grand challenge in organismal biology.

Authors:  Michelangelo von Dassow; Lance A Davidson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Embryonic bauplans and the developmental origins of facial diversity and constraint.

Authors:  Nathan M Young; Diane Hu; Alexis J Lainoff; Francis J Smith; Raul Diaz; Abigail S Tucker; Paul A Trainor; Richard A Schneider; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Molecular heterochrony in the early development of Drosophila.

Authors:  J Kim; J Q Kerr; G S Min
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Divergence of craniofacial developmental trajectories among avian embryos.

Authors:  Francis J Smith; Christopher J Percival; Nathan M Young; Diane Hu; Richard A Schneider; Ralph S Marcucio; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.780

8.  Molecular signaling in zebrafish development and the vertebrate phylotypic period.

Authors:  Aurélie Comte; Julien Roux; Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  A standard system to study vertebrate embryos.

Authors:  Ingmar Werneburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Limb development and evolution: a frog embryo with no apical ectodermal ridge (AER).

Authors:  M K Richardson; T F Carl; J Hanken; R P Elinson; C Cope; P Bagley
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.