Literature DB >> 8612474

Risk and management of hypertension-related left ventricular hypertrophy.

K K Teo1.   

Abstract

Knowledge gained from epidemiological studies and clinical trials on hypertension has led to impressive reductions in morbidity and mortality, particularly from stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) as complications of end-organ damage from untreated, prolonged systemic hypertension. Data on reductions in stroke when hypertension is treated have been clear and convincing from individual clinical trials. Most of these trials, however, have consistently shown only trends towards a reduction in CHD, and few have individually reported statistically significant reductions. A recent meta-analysis, however, suggests that a significant beneficial reduction in CHD exists when the overall data are examined, although at a lower magnitude of benefit and lesser degree of certainty than for stroke. The presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) increases the risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease events, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality in hypertensive patients. Although echocardiography appears more sensitive than electrocardiography in diagnosing LVH, much of the information demonstrating risks from LVH is from electrocardiography data, and it is not clear how echocardiography will change the risk prediction. Some data from large clinical trials and populations studies suggest that LVH regresses, particularly if the hypertension is adequately treated. A meta-analysis of a large number of small clinical studies in hypertensive patients suggests that the 4 commonly used antihypertensive drug classes, beta-blockers, diuretics, calcium channel antagonists and ACE inhibitors, are all associated with significant reductions in left ventricular mass. While the primary indication for treatment is clearly the hypertension and not the LVH, the presence of the latter necessitates careful treatment and follow-up of these hypertensive individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8612474     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199550060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  73 in total

1.  Multivariate analysis of the relationship of seven variables to blood pressure: findings of the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry, 1967-1972.

Authors:  J Stamler; P Rhomberg; J A Schoenberger; R B Shekelle; A Dyer; S Shekelle; R Stamler; J Wannamaker
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1975-11

2.  A longitudinal study of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  O PAUL; M H LEPPER; W H PHELAN; G W DUPERTUIS; A MACMILLAN; H McKEAN; H PARK
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality in the Framingham study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; T Gordon; D Offutt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1967-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Primary prevention with metoprolol in patients with hypertension. Mortality results from the MAPHY study.

Authors:  J Wikstrand; I Warnold; G Olsson; J Tuomilehto; D Elmfeldt; G Berglund
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Treatment of mild hypertension: a five year controlled drug trial. The Oslo study.

Authors:  A Helgeland
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Beta-blockers versus diuretics in hypertensive men: main results from the HAPPHY trial.

Authors:  L Wilhelmsen; G Berglund; D Elmfeldt; T Fitzsimons; H Holzgreve; J Hosie; P E Hörnkvist; K Pennert; J Tuomilehto; H Wedel
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Smoking and other risk factors for coronary heart-disease in British civil servants.

Authors:  D D Reid; P J Hamilton; P McCartney; G Rose; R J Jarrett; H Keen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-11-06       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Oslo Hypertension Study.

Authors:  P Leren; A Helgeland
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.546

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Drug selection for optimal treatment of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  E Shammas; K Dickstein
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.