Literature DB >> 8612384

Age-related difference in tamoxifen disposition.

F Peyrade1, M Frenay, M C Etienne, F Ruch, C Guillemare, E François, M Namer, J M Ferrero, G Milano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetic aspects of tamoxifen, such as the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (toxicity and clinical response) relationship and the influence of hepatic dysfunction, age, treatment duration, and associated chemotherapy on tamoxifen pharmacokinetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixteen patients with breast cancer (247 postmenopausal women) were investigated. Mean age was 58 years (age range, 29 to 85 years). One hundred seventeen patients received tamoxifen as single therapy (adjuvant, 60; neoadjuvant, 17; metastatic, 40); 292 of 316 received 30 mg daily. We obtained 794 blood samples at steady state. Tamoxifen and metabolites, N-desmethyltamoxifen, N-desdimethyltamoxifen, primary alcohol, and 4-hydroxytamoxifen were measured by HPLC.
RESULTS: Serum concentrations of tamoxifen and metabolites showed a wide asymmetrical distribution. Median and extremes were 347 nmol/L (not detectable [ND] to 1677) for tamoxifen, 572 nmol/L (ND to 3132) for N-desmethyltamoxifen, 109 nmol/L (ND to 795) for N-desdimethyltamoxifen, and 59 nmol/L (ND to 390) for primary alcohol. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen was detectable in 9.5% of the samples (ND to 162 nmol/L). Neither the absolute nor the relative concentrations of each compound showed significant variations during treatment. Chemotherapy concomitant with tamoxifen slightly increased the tamoxifen blood concentration. Hepatic dysfunction had no obvious effect on drug concentrations, an exception being a slight reduction in the relative proportion of tamoxifen. The influence of age revealed that concentrations of tamoxifen and metabolites increased significantly with age: women younger than 40 years had a tamoxifen plus metabolite median concentration of 802 nmol/L compared with 2428 nmol/L for women older than 80 years. In the 28 patients in whom tamoxifen-related side effects developed, the proportion of demethylated metabolites was higher than that in patients in whom toxicity did not develop. There was no difference in drug concentrations between responding and nonresponding patients.
CONCLUSION: Despite the tremendous interpatient variability in drug concentrations, the present data show that tamoxifen and metabolite concentrations significantly increase with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8612384     DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(96)90108-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  17 in total

1.  Mammographic density changes following discontinuation of tamoxifen in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Won Hwa Kim; Nariya Cho; Young-Seon Kim; Ann Yi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The modulatory role of low concentrations of bisphenol A on tamoxifen-induced proliferation and apoptosis in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Nao Luo; Xinhao Wu; Zhixiang Xu; Xiaoxia Wang; Xuejun Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Use of in vitro and in vivo data to estimate the likelihood of metabolic pharmacokinetic interactions.

Authors:  R J Bertz; G R Granneman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics of selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Authors:  Karla C Morello; Gregory T Wurz; Michael W DeGregorio
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Associations between tamoxifen, estrogens, and FSH serum levels during steady state tamoxifen treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Gjerde; Jürgen Geisler; Steinar Lundgren; Dagfinn Ekse; Jan Erik Varhaug; Gunnar Mellgren; Vidar M Steen; Ernst A Lien
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Regulation of intracellular calcium release and PP1alpha in a mechanism for 4-hydroxytamoxifen-induced cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Aliccia Bollig; Liping Xu; Archana Thakur; Jiusheng Wu; Tuan H Kuo; Joshua D Liao
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.396

7.  Differential effects of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) tamoxifen, ospemifene and raloxifene on human osteoclasts in vitro.

Authors:  H Michael; P L Härkönen; L Kangas; H K Väänänen; T A Hentunen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Tamoxifen and its Metabolites in Women of Different CYP2D6 Phenotypes Provides New Insight into the Tamoxifen Mass Balance.

Authors:  Kristin Dickschen; Stefan Willmann; Kirstin Thelen; Jörg Lippert; Georg Hempel; Thomas Eissing
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Computational Treatment Simulations to Assess the Need for Personalized Tamoxifen Dosing in Breast Cancer Patients of Different Biogeographical Groups.

Authors:  Anna Mueller-Schoell; Robin Michelet; Lena Klopp-Schulze; Madelé van Dyk; Thomas E Mürdter; Matthias Schwab; Markus Joerger; Wilhelm Huisinga; Gerd Mikus; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Tissue distribution of 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifen and tamoxifen-N-oxide.

Authors:  Jennifer Gjerde; Sara Gandini; Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga; Line L Haugan Moi; Valentina Aristarco; Gunnar Mellgren; Andrea Decensi; Ernst A Lien
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.