Literature DB >> 8610244

Magnetic resonance imaging differentiation of compression spine fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis or tumor.

R E Rupp1, N A Ebraheim, R J Coombs.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study reviewed the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of atraumatic compression fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis of tumor.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics that will allow differentiation of compression fractures or vertebral lesions due to osteoporosis or tumor. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous reports have identified several magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of benign and malignant compression fractures. However, diagnosis has been confirmed primarily by clinical follow-up and not pathologic biopsy specimen.
METHODS: Thirty-four cases of atraumatic compression fractures or vertebral lesions that had undergone magnetic resonance imaging evaluation followed by biopsy were retrospectively reviewed. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging with T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in all cases and gadolinium was used in 21 cases. Each case was evaluated for magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the compression fractures or vertebral lesions that included decreased T1 and increased T2 signal, marrow preservation on the T1 image, gadolinium lesion enhancement, multiple level involvement, associated soft tissue mass, posterior vertebral expansion, and pedicle involvement.
RESULTS: Eighteen of the compression fractures or vertebral lesions were confirmed as tumor and 16 were confirmed as osteoporosis by biopsy. Decreased T1- weighted and increased T2-weighted signals are sensitive but not specific for tumor involvement. Normal marrow preservation of the compressed vertebral body on T1 imaging is consistent with an osteoporotic fracture or lesion. Gadolinium enhancement, multiple level involvement, and posterior vertebral expansion are not useful for differentiation of osteoporotic from tumor fractures or lesions. Pedicle involvement or an associated soft tissue mass are specific for a tumor compression fracture or vertebral lesion.
CONCLUSIONS: There are characteristic magnetic resonance imaging findings of compression fractures or vertebral lesions that allow sensitive and specific differentiation of osteoporosis from tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8610244     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199512000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Rzewuska; Manuela Ferreira; Andrew J McLachlan; Gustavo C Machado; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Can you diagnose for vertebral fracture correctly by plain X-ray?

Authors:  Z Ito; A Harada; Y Matsui; M Takemura; N Wakao; T Suzuki; T Nihashi; S Kawatsu; H Shimokata; N Ishiguro
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness.

Authors:  D Schellinger; C S Lin; H G Hatipoglu; D Fertikh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation between osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  G Pozzi; C Garcia Parra; P Stradiotti; T V Tien; A Luzzati; A Zerbi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Multiparameter MRI assessment of normal-appearing and diseased vertebral bone marrow.

Authors:  Andreas Biffar; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Gerwin P Schmidt; Maximilian F Reiser; Olaf Dietrich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Histological evaluation of bone biopsy results during PVP or PKP of vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Jigang Li; Huilin Yang; Zongping Luo; Jun Zou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Cutting-edge imaging of the spine.

Authors:  A Talia Vertinsky; Michael V Krasnokutsky; Michael Augustin; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Does the META score evaluating osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral fractures have enough agreement to be used by orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of training?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Pablo Besa; Sergio Morales; Antonio Parlange; Sebastian Flores; Mauricio Campos; Sebastian Mobarec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Identifying Unsuspected Malignancy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Chew Zhihong; Cheng Sheng DA Jowell; Syed Aftab; Seang Beng Tan; Chang Ming Guo; John Chen Li Tat; Poh Ling Fong; William Yeo; Mashfiqul A Siddiqui
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

10.  Diffusion weighted MR imaging in acute vertebral compression fractures: differentiation between malignant and benign causes.

Authors:  Aa Bhugaloo; Bjj Abdullah; Ys Siow; Kh Ng
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.