Literature DB >> 8609347

Echocardiography can predict which patients will develop severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy.

L R Padial1, N Freitas, A Sagie, J B Newell, A E Weyman, R A Levine, I F Palacios.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Using two-dimensional echocardiography, we sought to identify features that are associated with severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy and combine them into a predictive score.
BACKGROUND: Severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy is a major complication carrying an adverse prognosis that, to date, has not been predictable in advance.
METHODS: In a consecutive series of 566 patients who underwent percutaneous mitral valvulotomy, 37 (6.5%) developed severe mitral regurgitation (assessed by angiography) after the procedure, 31 of whom had an echocardiogram available before percutaneous mitral valvulotomy. These 31 patients were matched by age, gender, mitral valve area and degree of mitral regurgitation before valvulotomy with 31 randomly selected patients who did not develop severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy. An echocardiographic score was developed on the basis of the pathologic studies of valves of patients who developed severe regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy (leaflet rupture of relatively thin portions of nonhomogeneously thickened leaflets in the presence of commissural and subvalvular calcification) and evaluated uneven distribution of thickness in the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets, degree of commissural disease and subvalvular disease involvement, with each component graded from 0 to 4 (total, 0 to 16). Intraobserver and interobserver variability for score assessment were 6% and 7%, respectively.
RESULTS: The total mitral regurgitation echocardiographic score was significantly greater in the severe mitral regurgitation group (11.7 +/- 1.9 [mean +/- SD] vs. 8.0 +/- 1.2, p < 0.001). In addition, the component grades for the anterior leaflet (3.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.6, p < 0.001), commissures (2.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6, p < 0.001) and subvalvular apparatus (3.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.7, p < 0.001) were also higher in the mitral regurgitation group. With a total score > or = 10 as a cutoff point for predicting severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy, a sensitivity of 90 +/- 5% and a specificity of 97 +/- 3% were obtained. Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified the mitral regurgitation echocardiographic score as the only independent predictor for developing severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This new mitral regurgitation echocardiographic score can predict the development of severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy and can be useful in the selection of patients for this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609347     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00594-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

1.  Contemporary criteria for the selection of patients for percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty.

Authors:  B D Prendergast; T R D Shaw; B Iung; A Vahanian; D B Northridge
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Subvalvular disease in patients undergoing balloon mitral valvotomy: a strong base is not always good.

Authors:  Vivek Chaturvedi; Mohit D Gupta; Girish M P
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-08-17

3.  Reconsiderations of mitral stenosis: rheumatic mitral valve repair and the Wilkins score.

Authors:  Haruka Makinae; Masao Daimon; Keiichi Tambara; Sakiko Miyazaki; Hiroshi Iwamura; Hirotaka Inaba; Taira Yamamoto; Hiroyuki Daida; Atsushi Amano
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-06-29

Review 4.  The long-term outcome of balloon valvuloplasty for mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Bernard Iung; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  [Current standard in diagnosis and therapy of heart valve lesions].

Authors:  S Reith; H Körtke; O Volk; H G Klues
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

6.  Subvalvular apparatus and adverse outcome of balloon valvotomy in rheumatic mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Parag Bhalgat; Shrivallabh Karlekar; Santosh Modani; Ashish Agrawal; Charan Lanjewar; Ashish Nabar; Prafulla Kerkar; Nandu Agrawal; Pradeep Vaideeswar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-08-08

Review 7.  Indication and timing of percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy and the role of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  J Langerveld; J M P G Ernst; N M van Hemel; W Jaarsma
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Development and Validation of a Teaching Module for Echocardiographic Scoring of Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis.

Authors:  Nathan Stehouwer; Emmy Okello; Vedant Gupta; Alison L Bailey; Richard Josephson; Sri Krishna Madan Mohan; Mohammed N Osman; Chris T Longenecker
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Mitral Regurgitation After Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty: Insights Into Mechanisms and Impact on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Maria Carmo P Nunes; Robert A Levine; Renato Braulio; Marcelo A Pascoal-Xavier; Sammy Elmariah; Nayana F A Gomes; Juliana R Soares; William A M Esteves; Xin Zeng; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Livia S A Passos; Luiz G Passaglia; Victor T Ribeiro; Cláudio L Gelape; Paulo H N Costa; Lucas Lodi-Junqueira; Walderez Dutra; Timothy C Tan; Elena Aikawa; Judy Hung
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-16

10.  A differentiated morphological parameter-coding system to describe the suitability of mitral valve stenoses intended for percutaneous valvotomy.

Authors:  Nikola Bogunovic; Dieter Horstkotte; Werner Scholtz; Lothar Faber; Lukas Bogunovic; Frank van Buuren
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.