Literature DB >> 8609340

Three-year clinical follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stenting.

B D Klugherz1, D L DeAngelo, B K Kim, H C Herrmann, J W Hirshfeld, D M Kolansky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to examine late clinical outcome in a cohort of patients who electively received Palmaz-Schatz intracoronary stents, to identify specific predictors of outcome and to determine the time course of the development of ischemic cardiac events after stenting.
BACKGROUND: Short-term results of Palmaz-Schatz intracoronary stenting have been promising, with a reduction in both angiographic restenosis and clinical cardiac events up to 1 year after stenting.
METHODS: We analyzed the clinical outcomes in 65 consecutive patients who underwent stenting at least 3 years before analysis. Demographic, clinical and procedural predictors of survival and event-free survival, defined as freedom from myocardial infarction, stent-site percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or death, were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 17 months.
RESULTS: Absolute survival and event-free survival at 3 years were 88% and 56%, respectively. Three-year freedom from stent-site revascularization was 66%. Predictors of decreased long-term survival (p < 0.05) included diabetes and a high angina score (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III/IV) at 6 and 12 months after stenting. Predictors of decreased event-free survival (p < 0.05) included a high angina score at 3, 6 and 12 months after stenting, smaller stent deployment balloon size and greater number of stents implanted. Freedom from adverse events by 6 months after stenting also correlated with long-term event-free survival. Eighty-five percent of stent-site revascularizations occurred within 1 year. During late follow-up (>24 months), no patients had stent-site stenoses requiring revascularization, whereas 11% of patients required revascularization in nonstented coronary segments.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical predictors of worse long-term outcome included diabetes mellitus, higher angina score at follow-up, smaller stent deployment balloon size and greater number of stents at implantation. During follow-up, the majority of adverse events and stent-site revascularizations occurred early after stenting, and disease progression in nonstented vessels accounted for the majority of late revascularization events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609340     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00574-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

Review 1.  Fortnightly review: Intracoronary stents.

Authors:  M M Gandhi; K D Dawkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

Review 2.  [Pathophysiology and therapeutic concepts in coronary restenosis].

Authors:  H G Klues; P W Radke; R Hoffmann; J vom Dahl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Long term outcome after coronary stent implantation: a 10 year single centre experience of 1000 patients.

Authors:  R T van Domburg; D P Foley; P P de Jaegere; P de Feyter; M van den Brand; W van der Giessen; J Hamburger; P W Serruys
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Living with heart disease after angioplasty: A qualitative study of patients who have been successful or unsuccessful in multiple behavior change.

Authors:  Janey C Peterson; John P Allegrante; Paul A Pirraglia; Laura Robbins; K Patrick Lane; Kathryn A Boschert; Mary E Charlson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Management of Acute Ischemic Coronary Syndromes: The Present and Future.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  The evaluation of primary stenting of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of crural arteries.

Authors:  Aleksander Falkowski; Wojciech Poncyljusz; Grazyna Wilk; Małgorzata Szczerbo-Trojanowska
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Efficacy and safety of low-dose pioglitazone after primary coronary angioplasty with the use of bare metal stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction and with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  Jin Yokoyama; Naoyuki Sutoh; Takumi Higuma; Daisuke Horiuchi; Chisato Katoh; Takashi Yokota; Takashi Echizen; Shingo Sasaki; Hiroyuki Hanada; Tomohiro Osanai; Ken Okumura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Long-term outcome after coronary stenting.

Authors:  Adnan Kastrati; Donald Hall; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000

9.  Long term outcomes after bare metal stent implantation.

Authors:  S Harikrishnan; Rajesh Muralidharan; Avinash Mani; G Sanjay; Srinivasa Prasad; S Bijulal; S Sivasankaran; Ajit Kumar Valaparambil
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2021-10-21

10.  Clinical and angiographic outcomes after intracoronary bare-metal stenting.

Authors:  I-Chang Hsieh; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Shang-Hung Chang; Chao-Yung Wang; Cheng-Hung Lee; Fen-Chiung Lin; Chun-Chi Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.