Literature DB >> 8609300

Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of / / and /l/.

J E Flege1, N Takagi, V Mann.   

Abstract

This study assessed the influence of subjective lexical familiarity and English-language experience on Japanese adults' accuracy in identifying singleton word-initial tokens of English [symbol: see text] and /l/. The inexperienced Japanese (IJ) subjects had lived in the U.S. for 2 years, whereas the experienced Japanese (EJ) subjects had lived there for 21 years, on average. The native Japanese subjects correctly identified English [symbol: see text] and /l/ tokens less often than did a group of native English (NE) subjects, but they did not differ from the NE subjects in identifying the control consonants /w/ and /d/. The NE subjects, who were at ceiling, showed no effect of subjective lexical familiarity. However, the EJ and IJ subjects correctly identified [symbol: see text] and /l/ tokens more often in words that were more familiar than their minimal pairs than in words that were less familiar than their minimal pairs. The EJ subjects identified liquids more often than did the IJ subjects, but usually less often than the NE subjects. However, the EJ subjects managed to identify [symbol: see text] tokens at rates comparable to the NE subjects' rates in words that wer matched in subjective familiarity to their minimal pair (experiment 1), and when identifying [symbol: see text] tokens that had been edited out of their original word or nonword context (experiment 2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609300     DOI: 10.1121/1.414884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception.

Authors:  Bruce D McCandliss; Julie A Fiez; Athanassios Protopapas; Mary Conway; James L McClelland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Language specificity in speech perception: perception of Mandarin tones by native and nonnative listeners.

Authors:  Tsan Huang; Keith Johnson
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Predicting Native English-Like Performance by Native Japanese Speakers.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; James L McClelland; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-10

4.  Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.

Authors:  Jessamyn Schertz; Taehong Cho; Andrew Lotto; Natasha Warner
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-09-01

5.  Can native Japanese listeners learn to differentiate/r-l/on the basis of F3 onset frequency?

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Lori L Holt; James L McClelland
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2012-04

6.  An acoustic analysis of American English liquids by adults and children: Native English speakers and native Japanese speakers of English.

Authors:  Katsura Aoyama; James E Flege; Reiko Akahane-Yamada; Tsuneo Yamada
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation.

Authors:  Natalia Kartushina; Ulrich H Frauenfelder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-05

8.  Fuzzy Nonnative Phonolexical Representations Lead to Fuzzy Form-to-Meaning Mappings.

Authors:  Svetlana V Cook; Nick B Pandža; Alia K Lancaster; Kira Gor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-21

9.  Successful non-native speech perception is linked to frequency following response phase consistency.

Authors:  Akihiro Omote; Kyle Jasmin; Adam Tierney
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Perception of English phonetic contrasts by Dutch children: How bilingual are early-English learners?

Authors:  Claire Goriot; James M McQueen; Sharon Unsworth; Roeland van Hout; Mirjam Broersma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.