Literature DB >> 8609111

Vertebral body shape as a predictor of spinal deformity in osteogenesis imperfecta.

S Ishikawa1, S J Kumar, H E Takahashi, M Homma.   

Abstract

We analyzed forty-four patients who had osteogenesis imperfecta, in order to determine the prevalence of spinal deformities. At the time of the most recent follow-up scoliosis was present in thirty patients (68 per cent) and kyphosis, in eighteen (41 per cent). According to the classification system of Falvo et al., scoliosis progressed rapidly with growth in twelve of fifteen patients who had the congenita type of osteogenesis imperfecta and in four of thirteen who had the tarda-I type. Curves that progressed before puberty did not always continue to progress after cessation of growth. Lateral roentgenograms made at the initial examination revealed four types of vertebral body deformities: biconcave, flattened, wedged, and unclassifiable vertebrae:Biconcave vertebrae were seen characteristically in patients who had the congenita type of osteogenesis imperfecta. The presence of six biconcave vertebrae or more before puberty indicated that severe scoliosis (more than 50 degrees) was likely to develop. Biconcave vertebrae did not appear to affect the severity of kyphosis. The other types of vertebral deformities were not useful for predicting progression of spinal deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609111     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199602000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  8 in total

Review 1.  The genetic implication of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: a review.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Jia Chen; Yangzhong Zhou; Yuzhi Zuo; Sen Liu; Weisheng Chen; Zhihong Wu; Nan Wu
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

2.  Osteogenesis imperfecta in childhood: effects of spondylodesis on functional ability, ambulation and perceived competence.

Authors:  N Tolboom; E A Cats; P J M Helders; J E H Pruijs; R H H Engelbert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Femoral geometric parameters and BMD measurements by DXA in adult patients with different types of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Roland Kocijan; Christian Muschitz; Nadja Fratzl-Zelman; Judith Haschka; Hans-Peter Dimai; Angela Trubrich; Christina Bittighofer; Heinrich Resch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Cementless posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of OI patients with severe spine deformity-a case series.

Authors:  Ron Gurel; Dror Ovadia; David E Lebel; Leonid Zeitlin; Amit Sigal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Compression Fractures and Partial Phenotype Rescue With a Low Phosphorus Diet in the Chihuahua Zebrafish Osteogenesis Imperfecta Model.

Authors:  Silvia Cotti; Ann Huysseune; Daria Larionova; Wolfgang Koppe; Antonella Forlino; Paul Eckhard Witten
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Association between joint hypermobility, scoliosis, and cranial base anomalies in paediatric Osteogenesis imperfecta patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Heidi Arponen; Outi Mäkitie; Janna Waltimo-Sirén
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Complex spine deformities in young patients with severe osteogenesis imperfecta: current concepts review.

Authors:  R M Castelein; C Hasler; I Helenius; D Ovadia; M Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Roentgenographic Evaluation of the Spine in Patients With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Marcos Vaz de Lima; Fabiana Vaz de Lima; Miguel Akkari; Vanessa Ribeiro de Resende; Claudio Santili
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.