Literature DB >> 8607926

Comparing the hospitalizations of transfer and non-transfer patients in an academic medical center.

A M Bernard1, R A Hayward, J Rosevear, H Chun, L F McMahon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: By accepting and caring for patients transferred from other institutions, academic medical centers have been able to develop comprehensive training and research programs. Whether academic institutions can continue to do this in the future is questionable. To the extent that transfer patients are more complex and severely ill than non-transfer patients, they are likely to consume more resources, and in managed care payment systems, they could place accepting hospitals in financial jeopardy.
METHOD: Between July 1989 and December 1993, the internal medicine, surgery, and pediatrics services of the 880-bed University Hospital of the University of Michigan accepted 8,740 patients from other hospitals. The hospitalizations of these patients were compared with those of the 76,047 non-transfer patients on these services. The statistical methods used were Student's t-test, chi-square, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square, and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: The hospitalizations of the transfer patients were more complex and resource-use intensive. The transfer patients were more likely (p<.0000) to be length-of-stay outliers as defined by Medicare standards (28% vs 10%) and to suffer in-hospital death (9.4% vs 2.5%). After case-mix adjustment and exclusion of length-of-stay outliers, transfer patients on the three services (surgery, medicine, and pediatrics) remained in the hospital 1.62, 1.15, and 0.84 days longer (p<.0001) than non-transfer patients. Ancillary-service resource use was assessed using a relative-value-unit (RVU) scale based on direct-cost dollars. The transfer patients' case-mix-adjusted resource use exceeded that of the non-transfer patients by 1,155,850 and 957 RVUs for surgery, pediatrics, and medicine (p<.0001). Although the transfer patients were more likely to have Medicaid insurance, the differences in lengths of stay and use of ancillary services persisted throughout all insurance groups. Indeed, transfer status, compared with age, sex, and insurance status, was the best predictor of high resource use.
CONCLUSION: The transfer patients stayed longer and consumed more hospital resources than did the non-transfer patients. Age, sex, case-mix, and insurance status did not account for these differences. To limit the financial liability that transfer patients pose, academic medical centers could be forced to abandon their traditional role of caring for such patients. The consequences of this possibility should be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8607926     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199603000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  13 in total

1.  Commentary: economic transfers, the changing face of a familiar problem.

Authors:  J S Weissman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Inter-hospital transfer is associated with increased mortality and costs in severe sepsis and septic shock: An instrumental variables approach.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Dan M Shane; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; James C Torner
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Outcomes of Ventilated Patients With Sepsis Who Undergo Interhospital Transfer: A Nationwide Linked Analysis.

Authors:  Barret Rush; Patrick D Tyler; David J Stone; Benjamin P Geisler; Keith R Walley; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Impact of Patient-Level Characteristics on In-hospital Mortality After Interhospital Transfer to Medicine Services: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Marc Heincelman; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Elizabeth Kirkland; Samuel O Schumann; Andrew Schreiner; Phillip Warr; Jingwen Zhang; Patrick D Mauldin; William P Moran; Don C Rockey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Interhospital transfer patients discharged by academic hospitalists and general internists: Characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  Lauge Sokol-Hessner; Andrew A White; Katherine F Davis; Shoshana J Herzig; Samuel F Hohmann
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.960

6.  Looking forward, looking back: assessing variations in hospital resource use and outcomes for elderly patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Michael K Ong; Carol M Mangione; Patrick S Romano; Qiong Zhou; Andrew D Auerbach; Alein Chun; Bruce Davidson; Theodore G Ganiats; Sheldon Greenfield; Michael A Gropper; Shaista Malik; J Thomas Rosenthal; José J Escarce
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-10-13

7.  Academic Geriatric Orthopaedics: A New paradigm for Inpatient Care.

Authors:  Carmen E Quatman; Jessica Wiseman; Laura Phieffer
Journal:  Curr Geriatr Rep       Date:  2018-11-13

8.  Association Between Teaching Status and Mortality in US Hospitals.

Authors:  Laura G Burke; Austin B Frakt; Dhruv Khullar; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Does interhospital transfer improve outcome of acute myocardial infarction? A propensity score analysis from the Cardiovascular Cooperative Project.

Authors:  John M Westfall; Catarina I Kiefe; Norman W Weissman; Anthony Goudie; Robert M Centor; O Dale Williams; Jeroan J Allison
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Adverse events during rotary-wing transport of mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Jeremy M Kahn; C William Schwab; Barry D Fuchs
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.