Literature DB >> 8607242

The multiple reoperative bladder exstrophy closure: what affects the potential of the bladder?

J P Gearhart1, J Ben-Chaim, C Sciortino, P D Sponseller, R D Jeffs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define the possible cause of failure and the eventual potential of the bladder in 23 exstrophy patients, who underwent more than two failed prior attempts at closure.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients were selected from the exstrophy data base who had two or more prior closures. Eighteen patients had undergone 2 previous closures and 5 patients 3 previous closures for either complete dehiscence or significant prolapse. At the time of initial closure, 19 patients did not have an osteotomy. At secondary closure, 10 underwent osteotomy while at third closure 5 had an osteotomy. At the time of reclosure at our institution all underwent an osteotomy.
RESULTS: Reoperative repair at our institution was successful in all patients. Six patients achieved a bladder size suitable for bladder neck reconstruction and of them 3 are dry. The bladder size was inadequate in 9 patients and 8 are being monitored for possible bladder growth.
CONCLUSIONS: Tension-free closure with osteotomy and immobilization are important factors both in an initial or any subsequent closure. The chance of obtaining an adequate bladder capacity for bladder neck plasty and eventual continence, following multiple reclosures, is markedly diminished.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8607242     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80424-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

Review 1.  Modern management of bladder exstrophy repair.

Authors:  Brian M Inouye; Eric Z Massanyi; Heather Di Carlo; Bhavik B Shah; John P Gearhart
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Female bladder exstrophy.

Authors:  S J Crankson; S Ahmed
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

3.  Comparing the bulking effect of calcium hydroxyapatite and Deflux injection into the bladder neck for improvement of urinary incontinence in bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex.

Authors:  Sahar Eftekharzadeh; Nastaran Sabetkish; Shabnam Sabetkish; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Bladder Augmentation Using Lyoplant®: First Experimental Results in Rats.

Authors:  F Winde; K Backhaus; J A Zeitler; N Schlegel; Th Meyer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.169

5.  Perioperative management of classic bladder exstrophy.

Authors:  Eric Z Massanyi; John P Gearhart; Sabine Kost-Byerly
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2013-03-12

Review 6.  Modern management of the exstrophy-epispadias complex.

Authors:  Brian M Inouye; Ali Tourchi; Heather N Di Carlo; Ezekiel E Young; John P Gearhart
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-05

Review 7.  The exstrophy-epispadias complex.

Authors:  Anne-Karoline Ebert; Heiko Reutter; Michael Ludwig; Wolfgang H Rösch
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.123

8.  The long-term outcomes after staged repair of exstrophy-epispadias complex.

Authors:  Sajni I Khemchandani
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.