Literature DB >> 8606286

Impact of wall constraint on velocity distribution in proximal flow convergence zone. Implications for color Doppler quantification of mitral regurgitation.

M Pu1, P M Vandervoort, N L Greenberg, K A Powell, B P Griffin, J D Thomas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to elevate the effect of proximal flow constraint induced by the left ventricular wall on the accuracy of calculated flow rates and to assess a possible correction factor to adjust the proximal convergence angle. We further defined under which hydrodynamic and geometric conditions it is necessary to apply the corrected convergence angle.
BACKGROUND: The proximal flow convergence method has been proposed as a new approach to quantify valvular regurgitation. However, significant overestimation of the calculated regurgitant flow rate has been reported, particularly in patients with mitral valve prolapse and severe mitral regurgitation.
METHODS: We used an in vitro flow model and induced various degrees of proximal flow constraint. The accuracy of the proposed convergence angle formula, alpha = tau + 2 tan-1 d/r (d = wall distance; r = isovelocity radius) was tested in vitro and in a three-dimensional numerical simulation.
RESULTS: With a constraining wall near the orifice, overstimulation of regurgitant flow rates was noted and was most significant with the constraining wall positioned closest to the orifice (calculated flow rate [Qc]/true flow rate [Qo] = 1.85 +/- 0.55 [mean +/- SD]). These findings were similar to the results of the numerical simulation. Applying the correction factor nearly completely eliminated the overestimation of the calculated flow rates (cQc), with cQc/Qo = 1.13 +/- 0.25.
CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of a constraining wall, significant overestimation of calculated flow rates is observed when hemispheric symmetry of the flow field is assumed. In this situation, it is necessary to apply the corrected convergence angle formula to improve the accuracy of the proximal flow convergence method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8606286     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00509-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative assessment of mitral insufficiency: its advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Anna Paszczuk; Susan E Wiegers
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  A three-dimensional insight into the complexity of flow convergence in mitral regurgitation: adjunctive benefit of anatomic regurgitant orifice area.

Authors:  Sonal Chandra; Ivan S Salgo; Lissa Sugeng; Lynn Weinert; Scott H Settlemier; Victor Mor-Avi; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Usefulness of 3D-PISA as compared to guideline endorsed parameters for mitral regurgitation quantification.

Authors:  Frank P Schmidt; Theresa Gniewosz; Alexander Jabs; Thomas Münzel; Ulrich Hink; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ralph-Stephan von Bardeleben
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Assessment, Physical Examination, and Imaging.

Authors:  Nina C Wunderlich; Roy Beigel; Florian Rader; Jennifer Franke; Robert J Siegel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Assessment of severity of mechanical prosthetic mitral regurgitation by transoesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  A Vitarelli; Y Conde; E Cimino; T Leone; I D'Angeli; S D'Orazio; S Stellato
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.994

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.