| Literature DB >> 8605729 |
S Ishii1, T Mizoi, K Kawano, O Cay, P Thomas, A Nachman, R Ford, Y Shoji, J B Kruskal, G Steele, J M Jessup.
Abstract
In vivo fluorescence videomicroscopy (IVFM) was used to analyse the behavior of weakly and highly metastatic human colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cells during implantation in the liver. A highly metastatic human CRC cell line, CX-1, and a weakly metastatic line, Clone A, were double-labeled with rhodamine B isothiocyanate-dextran (Rd-Dx) to locate cells and with calcein AM to assess cell metabolic activity in an experimental metastasis model. Double-labeled CRC cells (2.0 x 10(6)) were injected into the spleens of groups of nude mice and the livers observed by IVFM over the next 72 h. CRC cells were implanted within 30 s after injection into either portal venules or the proximal third of hepatic sinusoids. Approximately 0.5% of CRC cells traversed the liver through portal-central venous shunts and implanted in the lung. The number of CX-1 cells in the liver was similar to that of Clone A cells during the first 12 h. However, more CX-1 cells than Clone A cells remained in the liver at 4 h and were in groups of 8-12 cells whereas only a few, single Clone A cells were detected in the liver at 72 h. Not all Clone A cells are committed to die within 4 h of implantation because cells harvested 4 h after hepatic implantation proliferated normally in vitro when removed from the hepatic microenvironment. Since the stress of mechanical deformation during implantation may cause differences in cell survival, CX-1 and Clone A cells were passed through filters with 8 microM pores in vitro at 10-15 cm of water pressure to recreate the trauma of hepatic implantation. Approximately 50% of both CX-1 and Clone A cells were lysed. Furthermore, both CRC lines remained metabolically active when co-cultivated with liver cells for at least 24 h in vitro. Thus, the difference in metastatic potential between the two CRC lines may reside in their response to the combination of mechanical implantation and subsequent growth in the liver parenchyma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1996 PMID: 8605729 DOI: 10.1007/bf00121212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis ISSN: 0262-0898 Impact factor: 5.150