Literature DB >> 8605729

Implantation of human colorectal carcinoma cells in the liver studied by in vivo fluorescence videomicroscopy.

S Ishii1, T Mizoi, K Kawano, O Cay, P Thomas, A Nachman, R Ford, Y Shoji, J B Kruskal, G Steele, J M Jessup.   

Abstract

In vivo fluorescence videomicroscopy (IVFM) was used to analyse the behavior of weakly and highly metastatic human colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cells during implantation in the liver. A highly metastatic human CRC cell line, CX-1, and a weakly metastatic line, Clone A, were double-labeled with rhodamine B isothiocyanate-dextran (Rd-Dx) to locate cells and with calcein AM to assess cell metabolic activity in an experimental metastasis model. Double-labeled CRC cells (2.0 x 10(6)) were injected into the spleens of groups of nude mice and the livers observed by IVFM over the next 72 h. CRC cells were implanted within 30 s after injection into either portal venules or the proximal third of hepatic sinusoids. Approximately 0.5% of CRC cells traversed the liver through portal-central venous shunts and implanted in the lung. The number of CX-1 cells in the liver was similar to that of Clone A cells during the first 12 h. However, more CX-1 cells than Clone A cells remained in the liver at 4 h and were in groups of 8-12 cells whereas only a few, single Clone A cells were detected in the liver at 72 h. Not all Clone A cells are committed to die within 4 h of implantation because cells harvested 4 h after hepatic implantation proliferated normally in vitro when removed from the hepatic microenvironment. Since the stress of mechanical deformation during implantation may cause differences in cell survival, CX-1 and Clone A cells were passed through filters with 8 microM pores in vitro at 10-15 cm of water pressure to recreate the trauma of hepatic implantation. Approximately 50% of both CX-1 and Clone A cells were lysed. Furthermore, both CRC lines remained metabolically active when co-cultivated with liver cells for at least 24 h in vitro. Thus, the difference in metastatic potential between the two CRC lines may reside in their response to the combination of mechanical implantation and subsequent growth in the liver parenchyma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8605729     DOI: 10.1007/bf00121212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis        ISSN: 0262-0898            Impact factor:   5.150


  28 in total

Review 1.  Tumor invasion and metastases--role of the extracellular matrix: Rhoads Memorial Award lecture.

Authors:  L A Liotta
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Characterization of the tumorigenic and metastatic potential of a poorly differentiated human colon cancer cell line.

Authors:  H E Wagner; P Thomas; B C Wolf; N Zamcheck; J M Jessup; G D Steele
Journal:  Invasion Metastasis       Date:  1990

3.  Metastatic potential of human colorectal carcinomas implanted into nude mice: prediction of clinical outcome in patients operated upon for cure.

Authors:  J M Jessup; R Giavazzi; D Campbell; K R Cleary; K Morikawa; R Hostetter; E N Atkinson; I J Fidler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Critical factors in the biology of human cancer metastasis: twenty-eighth G.H.A. Clowes memorial award lecture.

Authors:  I J Fidler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colon cancer.

Authors:  B Cady; W V McDermott
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Intravital videomicroscopy of the chorioallantoic microcirculation: a model system for studying metastasis.

Authors:  I C MacDonald; E E Schmidt; V L Morris; A F Chambers; A C Groom
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.514

7.  Cancer-cell traffic in the liver. I. Growth kinetics of cancer cells after portal-vein delivery.

Authors:  E Barbera-Guillem; I Smith; L Weiss
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-12-02       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Mammary carcinoma cell lines of high and low metastatic potential differ not in extravasation but in subsequent migration and growth.

Authors:  V L Morris; S Koop; I C MacDonald; E E Schmidt; M Grattan; D Percy; A F Chambers; A C Groom
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 9.  Organ specificity of tumor metastasis: role of preferential adhesion, invasion and growth of malignant cells at specific secondary sites.

Authors:  G L Nicolson
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.264

10.  The impact of arterialization on hepatic microcirculation and leukocyte accumulation after liver transplantation in the rat.

Authors:  S Post; M D Menger; M Rentsch; A P Gonzalez; C Herfarth; K Messmer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of hyperthermia in combination with TRAIL on the JNK-Bim signal transduction pathway and growth of xenograft tumors.

Authors:  Marco A Alcala; Kyungsoo Park; Jinsang Yoo; Dae-Hee Lee; Bae-Hang Park; Byeong-Chel Lee; David L Bartlett; Yong J Lee
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 2.  The Use of Microfluidic Platforms to Probe the Mechanism of Cancer Cell Extravasation.

Authors:  Mark F Coughlin; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Galectin-3 protects human breast carcinoma cells against nitric oxide-induced apoptosis: implication of galectin-3 function during metastasis.

Authors:  B K Moon; Y J Lee; P Battle; J M Jessup; A Raz; H R Kim
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Carcinoembryonic antigen facilitates experimental metastasis through a mechanism that does not involve adhesion to liver cells.

Authors:  J M Jessup; S Ishii; T Mitzoi; K H Edmiston; Y Shoji
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Role of galectin-3 in breast cancer metastasis: involvement of nitric oxide.

Authors:  Young K Song; Timothy R Billiar; Yong J Lee
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Carcinoembryonic antigen promotes tumor cell survival in liver through an IL-10-dependent pathway.

Authors:  J Milburn Jessup; R Samara; P Battle; L M Laguinge
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  The prometastatic microenvironment of the liver.

Authors:  Fernando Vidal-Vanaclocha
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2008-05-17

8.  CD44H participates in the intrahepatic growth of murine colon 26 adenocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  T Ogoshi; S Ishii; T Mizoi; N Harada; W Sato; K Saito; H Ogawa; K Inabe; K Shiiba; S Matsuno
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1998-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.