Literature DB >> 8604689

Screening for antinuclear antibodies by enzyme immunoassay.

T D Jaskowski1, C Schroder, T B Martins, C L Mouritsen, C M Litwin, H R Hill.   

Abstract

Indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) ia most widely used method in clin clinical laboratories to screen for autoantibodies against a wide variety of nuclear antigens. Recently, a number of antinuclear antibody (ANA) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) screens have become commercially available and claim to be an alternative method to screen for ANAs. Given the subjectivity of technical interpretation of IFA and the high number of ANA negative samples, a suitable EIA method for ANA screening would be beneficial to clinical laboratories with large samples volumes. Five ANA EIA screens were compared (Elias, Helix, Sanofi, TheraTest and Zeus) to IFA using a human epithelial cell line (HEp-2). Sera from 601 patients submitted to our reference laboratory for autoimmune testing, and from 202 normal healthy blood donors, were included in this study. Samples with discordant results between IFA and EIA were further analyzed using single antigen EIAs for SSA, SSB, Sm, RNP, Scl-70, histones, dsDNA, and ssDNA. Analyses were based on clinically significant IFA titers of > or equal to 1:160 as positive and <1:40 as negative. When compared to IFA, agreement, sensitivity and specificity for each ANA EIA screen were as follows: Elias: 87.0%, 69.5% and 97.9%; Helix: 94.6%, 90.2%, and 97.3%; Sanofi: 95.0%, 93.7%, and 95.9%; TheraTest: 95.3%, 97.7%, and 93.5%; Zeus: 87.1%, 96.2%, and 81.4%, respectively. In conclusion, screening for ANAs by EIA using several commercial assays was both sensitive and specific when compared to IFA. Moreover, the EIA is objective and much less labor intensive when screening a large number of clinical specimens. None of the EIAs were 100% sensitive and, thus, may fail to detect a few of the nonspecific ANAs that demonstrate atypical as well as classical IFA patterns. The advantages of employing these nonsubjective assays to screen out the vast majority of ANA negative sera is clear. The authors still recommend confirming titers and patterns of sera with positive EIA screens using classical IFA methods employing HEp-2 cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604689     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/105.4.468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  11 in total

1.  Measurement of antinuclear antibodies: assessment of different test systems.

Authors:  P Kern; M Kron; K Hiesche
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Frequency and specificity of antibodies against nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens in healthy individuals by classic and new methods.

Authors:  E Giannouli; D Chatzidimitriou; S Gerou; E Gavriilaki; L Settas; E Diza
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Clinical value of multiplexed bead-based immunoassays for detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens.

Authors:  Erik Avaniss-Aghajani; Sophia Berzon; Arlen Sarkissian
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-03-21

4.  Comparison of antinuclear antibody testing methods: immunofluorescence assay versus enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  R A Gniewek; D P Stites; T M McHugh; J F Hilton; M Nakagawa
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1997-03

5.  Evaluation of multiplexed fluorescent microsphere immunoassay for detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens.

Authors:  Thomas B Martins; Rufus Burlingame; Carlos A von Mühlen; Troy D Jaskowski; Christine M Litwin; Harry R Hill
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2004-11

6.  Antinuclear antibody testing: discordance between commercial laboratories.

Authors:  Aryeh M Abeles; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Micha Abeles; Shyoko Honiden
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Association of an overlap syndrome of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis with cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  Megumi Toyoda-Akui; Hiroaki Yokomori; Fumihiko Kaneko; Yuki Shimizu; Hajime Takeuchi; Kumiko Tahara; Hide Yoshida; Hirobumi Kondo; Tadashi Motoori; Makoto Ohbu; Masaya Oda; Toshifumi Hibi
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2011-05-24

8.  Automation in indirect immunofluorescence testing: a new step in the evolution of the autoimmunology laboratory.

Authors:  Renato Tozzoli; Antonio Antico; Brunetta Porcelli; Danila Bassetti
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2012-07-13

9.  Antinuclear antibodies and their detection methods in diagnosis of connective tissue diseases: a journey revisited.

Authors:  Yashwant Kumar; Alka Bhatia; Ranjana Walker Minz
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 10.  The use and abuse of commercial kits used to detect autoantibodies.

Authors:  Marvin J Fritzler; Allan Wiik; Mark L Fritzler; Susan G Barr
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.