Literature DB >> 8604626

Dose-response relation between terfenadine (Seldane) and the QTc interval on the scalar electrocardiogram: distinguishing a drug effect from spontaneous variability.

C M Pratt1, S Ruberg, J Morganroth, B McNutt, J Woodward, S Harris, J Ruskin, L Moye.   

Abstract

The primary goal of this investigation was to describe the effect of terfenadine on the QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) of the scalar electrocardiogram (ECG). The design was double-blind, four-period crossover, dose escalation, which involved 28 normal healthy volunteers and 28 patients with stable cardiovascular disease. At baseline, the normal subjects had a mean QTc interval of 407 msec, whereas the patients with cardiovascular disease had a mean QTc interval of 417 msec (p<0.01). The largest increase in mean QTc on terfenadine was 24 msec in a normal subject and 28 msec in a patient with cardiovascular disease. The longest average QTc observed was 449 msec and 501 msec in any normal subject and patient with cardiovascular disease, respectively. Compared to baseline, terfenadine 60 mg twice daily is associated with a QTc increase of 6 msec in normal subjects and a 12 msec increase in patients with cardiovascular disease (p<0.01 vs baseline; p>0.05 when the two populations were compared). Although the QTc increase from baseline are statistically significant, the magnitude of the spontaneous variability in QTc in the same patients is much greater. Because 40 ECGs were obtained while taking placebo in each participant, the spontaneous variability in QTc interval with placebo was also described. Only one of the 28 normal subjects had a mean baseline QTc=440 msec, yet 14 of the 28 normal subjects had at lease one of the 40 placebo ECGs with a QTc=440 msec. The 28 patients with cardiovascular disease had a mean QTc at baseline of 417 msec; yet 20 of 28 had at lease one ECG on placebo with a QTc interval = 440 msec. On the average, the QTc fluctuated 56 msec in each patient during placebo administration. From the observed placebo variability, we calculated that an increase in QTc of=35 msec while receiving drug therapy is likely to represent a drug effect at the 95% confidence interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604626     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90525-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  31 in total

Review 1.  Drug-induced proarrhythmic effects: assessment of changes in QT interval.

Authors:  D J Sheridan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  The significance of QT interval in drug development.

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Comparing methods of measurement for detecting drug-induced changes in the QT interval: implications for thoroughly conducted ECG studies.

Authors:  Nkechi E Azie; Gregory Adams; Borje Darpo; Steven F Francom; Emery C Polasek; Joy M Wisser; Joseph C Fleishaker
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Does terfenadine-induced ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation directly relate to its QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes?

Authors:  Hua Rong Lu; An N Hermans; David J Gallacher
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Drug-induced long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Prince Kannankeril; Dan M Roden; Dawood Darbar
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  On the relationship among QT interval, atrial fibrillation, and torsade de pointes.

Authors:  Dan M Roden; Prince Kannankeril; Dawood Darbar
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Keep the QT interval: it is a reliable predictor of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Dan M Roden
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 8.  Thorough QT Studies: Questions and Quandaries.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Christine E Garnett; Joanne Zhang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Moving towards better predictors of drug-induced torsades de pointes.

Authors:  A S Bass; B Darpo; J-P Valentin; P Sager; K Thomas
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Update on the evaluation of a new drug for effects on cardiac repolarization in humans: issues in early drug development.

Authors:  Vaibhav Salvi; Dilip R Karnad; Gopi Krishna Panicker; Snehal Kothari
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.