Literature DB >> 8604367

Survival experience of chronically critically ill patients.

S Douglas1, B J Daly, E B Rudy, S M Sereika, L Menzel, R Song, M A Dyer, H D Montenegro.   

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients were randomly assigned to either a traditional ICU or a special care unit (SCU) for chronically critically ill patients. The SCU used a low-technology, family-oriented environment, nursing case management, no physician house staff, and a shared governance model. In comparison, the ICU used high technology, limited family visiting, primary care nursing, and a bureaucratic management model. The survival experience of chronically critically ill patients in the two environments during hospitalization, as well as after hospital discharge, was examined. Using survival analytic techniques, the 1-year cumulative mortality for all patients in the study was found to be 59.9%. Risk of death was significantly lower after discharge than during hospitalization. Similar mortality experiences were found for SCU and ICU patients. Thus, the high-technology ICU environment did not produce better outcomes than the SCU environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604367     DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199603000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  2 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; M H Edwards; A Forbes; R L Harris; G Ritchie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 2.  Patient and Family Centered Actionable Processes of Care and Performance Measures for Persistent and Chronic Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Laura Istanboulian; Laura Allum; Lisa Burry; Craig Dale; Nicholas Hart; Kalliopi Kydonaki; Pam Ramsay; Natalie Pattison; Bronwen Connolly
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2019-04-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.