Literature DB >> 8604066

Bite forces before and after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.

E Ellis1, G S Throckmorton, D P Sinn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was 1) to compare morphologic parameters and voluntary bite forces between controls and a sample of patients with mandibular prognathism before surgical correction, and 2) to examine how these patients' bite forces adapt after treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four prognathic patients were compared with 24 controls before and up to 3 years after mandibular setback surgery. Measures of skeletal morphology and maximum isometric bite force were made on all subjects over time. Statistical analysis compared the controls, the patients before surgery, and the patients after surgery.
RESULTS: Surgical shortening of the mandible averaged 4.1 mm, bringing most skeletal measures into the normal range. Before surgery, the jaw muscle mechanical advantages for patients were significantly smaller than for controls; surgery did not significantly change this relationship. Before surgery the patients had maximum isometric bite forces that were significantly less than those of controls. Bite forces steadily increased after surgery, approaching normal values within 2 to 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that correction of mandibular prognathism by mandibular setback surgery produces some significant functional benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604066     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90443-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques for fixing mandibular angle fractures: the introduction of a new 3D plate approach.

Authors:  Evagelos F Kalfarentzos; Despoina Deligianni; Georgios Mitros; Minos Tyllianakis
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-09

2.  Masseter muscle changes following orthognathic surgery: a long-term three-dimensional computed tomography follow-up.

Authors:  Da-Hye Lee; Hyung-Seog Yu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Validity of Medical Insurance Guidelines for Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Sydney A Schneider; Jaime Gateno; Kevin B Coppelson; Jeryl D English; James J Xia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Evaluation of Treatments in Patients with Nocturnal Bruxism on Bite Force and Occlusal Contact Area: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Alper Alkan; Emel Bulut; Selim Arici; Shuichi Sato
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-10

5.  Customized mandibular reconstruction plates improve mechanical performance in a mandibular reconstruction model.

Authors:  Ralf Gutwald; Raimund Jaeger; Floor M Lambers
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.

Authors:  Li-Ren Chang; Chien-Chung Chen; Seng Feng Jeng; Yu-Ray Chen; Lain-Chyr Hwang; Ting-Sheng Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison of the bite force and occlusal contact area of the deviated and non-deviated sides after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy in skeletal Class III patients with mandibular asymmetry: Two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Hyejin Kwon; Sun-Hyung Park; Hoi-In Jung; Woo-Chan Hwang; Yoon Jeong Choi; Chooryung Chung; Kyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 1.361

8.  Bite force evaluation in subjects with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Carla Renata Sipert; Ana Claudia Martins Sampaio; Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade; Alceu Sérgio Trindade
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Computer-assisted teaching of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: Learning curve for condylar positioning.

Authors:  Charles Savoldelli; Emmanuel Chamorey; Georges Bettega
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.