Literature DB >> 8603456

Inhibition of etoposide elimination in the isolated perfused rat liver by Cremophor EL and Tween 80.

A G Ellis1, N A Crinis, L K Webster.   

Abstract

Cremophor EL, a surfactant used in the clinical formulation of cyclosporine and paclitaxel, will reverse the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype in vitro. As other MDR modulators can alter the pharmacokinetics of cytotoxic drugs, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of Cremophor and another MDR-reversing surfactant, Tween 80, on the hepatic elimination and biliary excretion of etoposide. Using the isolated perfused rat-liver model with 80 ml recirculating perfusate containing 20% red blood cells and 4% bovine serum albumin, etoposide (1.6 mg) with and without Cremophor (800 or 80 mg) or Tween 80 (80 mg) was given into the perfusate reservoir, and perfusate and bile samples were collected for 3 h. Etoposide was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Cremophor was measured using a bioassay. Both surfactants changed the etoposide elimination profile from biphasic to monophasic. High-dose Cremophor increased the AUC (from 334 +/- 23 to 1540 +/- 490 microgram min ml(-1), P<0.05) and decreased the total clearance (from 4.8 +/- 0.3 to 1.1 +/- 0.3 ml/min, P<0.05) and biliary clearance (from 2.6 +/- 1.1 to 0.5 +/- 0.2 ml/min, p<0.05) but decreased the elimination half-life (from 62 +/- 17 to 40 +/- 5 min, P<0.05) and volume of distribution (from 424 +/- 85 to 65 +/- 19 ml, P<0.05). Low-dose Cremophor and Tween 80 caused intermediate effects on these parameters that were statistically significant for total clearance, half-life, and volume of distribution. Cremophor had no adverse effect on liver function, whereas Tween 80 caused haemolysis and cholestasis. The initial high-dose Cremophor perfusate concentration was 0.8 mg/ml, which previous studies have shown to be clinically relevant and close to the optimal level for MDR reversal in vitro (1.0 mg/ml). Cremophor may be a clinically useful MDR modulator, but it may alter the pharmacokinetics of the cytotoxic drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8603456     DOI: 10.1007/s002800050451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  8 in total

Review 1.  Role of formulation vehicles in taxane pharmacology.

Authors:  L van Zuylen; J Verweij; A Sparreboom
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.

Authors:  S J Clarke; L P Rivory
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Drug interactions of paclitaxel and docetaxel and their relevance for the design of combination therapy.

Authors:  L Vigano; A Locatelli; G Grasselli; L Gianni
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Albert J ten Tije; Jaap Verweij; Walter J Loos; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Drug delivery with carbon nanotubes for in vivo cancer treatment.

Authors:  Zhuang Liu; Kai Chen; Corrine Davis; Sarah Sherlock; Qizhen Cao; Xiaoyuan Chen; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  A critical review of lipid-based nanoparticles for taxane delivery.

Authors:  Lan Feng; Russell J Mumper
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  Impact of Dendrimers on Solubility of Hydrophobic Drug Molecules.

Authors:  Sonam Choudhary; Lokesh Gupta; Sarita Rani; Kaushalkumar Dave; Umesh Gupta
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  Safety of Polysorbate 80 in the Oncology Setting.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Rudolph M Navari
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.845

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.