Literature DB >> 8601587

The force for poleward chromosome motion in Haemanthus cells acts along the length of the chromosome during metaphase but only at the kinetochore during anaphase.

A Khodjakov1, R W Cole, A S Bajer, C L Rieder.   

Abstract

The force for poleward chromosome motion during mitosis is thought to act, in all higher organisms, exclusively through the kinetochore. We have used time-lapse. video-enhanced, differential interference contrast light microscopy to determine the behavior of kinetochore-free "acentric" chromosome fragments and "monocentric" chromosomes containing one kinetochore, created at various stages of mitosis in living higher plant (Haemanthus) cells by laser microsurgery. Acentric fragments and monocentric chromosomes generated during spindle formation and metaphase both moved towards the closest spindle pole at a rate (approximately 1.0 microm/min) similar to the poleward motion of anaphase chromosomes. This poleward transport of chromosome fragments ceased near the onset of anaphase and was replaced. near midanaphase, by another force that now transported the fragments to the spindle equator at 1.5-2.0 microm/min. These fragments then remained near the spindle midzone until phragmoplast development, at which time they were again transported randomly poleward but now at approximately 3 microm/min. This behavior of acentric chromosome fragments on anastral plant spindles differs from that reported for the astral spindles of vertebrate cells, and demonstrates that in forming plant spindles, a force for poleward chromosome motion is generated independent of the kinetochore. The data further suggest that the three stages of non-kinetochore chromosome transport we observed are all mediated by the spindle microtubules. Finally, our findings reveal that there are fundamental differences between the transport properties of forming mitotic spindles in plants and vertebrates.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8601587      PMCID: PMC2120764          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.132.6.1093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  44 in total

1.  Incorporation of Paramecium axonemal tubulin into higher plant cells reveals functional sites of microtubule assembly.

Authors:  M Vantard; N Levilliers; A M Hill; A Adoutte; A M Lambert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cine-micrographic analysis of C-mitosis in endosperm.

Authors:  J MOLE-BAJER
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1958       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Cine-micrographic studies on chromosome movements in beta-irradiated cell.

Authors:  A BAJER
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1958       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Chromosomal control of meiotic cell division.

Authors:  K S McKim; R S Hawley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Actin-like properties of colchicine binding protein isolated from brain.

Authors:  S Puszkin; S Berl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Centrosome and kinetochore movement during mitosis.

Authors:  J G Ault; C L Rieder
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 7.  Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements.

Authors:  S Inoué; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Chromosome movements in chloral hydrate treated endosperm cells in vitro.

Authors:  J Molé-Bajer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Polarity of midbody and phragmoplast microtubules.

Authors:  U Euteneuer; J R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Isolation of polypeptides with microtubule-translocating activity from phragmoplasts of tobacco BY-2 cells.

Authors:  T Asada; H Shibaoka
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  27 in total

1.  The kinesin-like calmodulin binding protein is differentially involved in cell division.

Authors:  J W Vos; F Safadi; A S Reddy; P K Hepler
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  The consequences of a non-uniform tension across kinetochores: lessons from segregation of chromosomes in the permanent translocation heterozygote Oenothera.

Authors:  Z Hejnowicz; L J Feldman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Nuclear organization and chromosome segregation.

Authors:  A E Franklin; W Z Cande
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Microtubule flux mediates poleward motion of acentric chromosome fragments during meiosis in insect spermatocytes.

Authors:  J R LaFountain; R Oldenbourg; R W Cole; C L Rieder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension.

Authors:  Katie B Shannon; Julie C Canman; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Plant neocentromeres: fast, focused, and driven.

Authors:  R Kelly Dawe; Evelyn N Hiatt
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Laser microsurgery in the GFP era: a cell biologist's perspective.

Authors:  Valentin Magidson; Jadranka Loncarek; Polla Hergert; Conly L Rieder; Alexey Khodjakov
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.441

8.  Identification of a maize neocentromere in an oat-maize addition line.

Authors:  C N Topp; R J Okagaki; J R Melo; R G Kynast; R L Phillips; R K Dawe
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 9.  Mechanisms of plant spindle formation.

Authors:  Han Zhang; R Kelly Dawe
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Kinetochore-independent chromosome poleward movement during anaphase of meiosis II in mouse eggs.

Authors:  Manqi Deng; Juntao Gao; Praveen Suraneni; Rong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.