Literature DB >> 8600357

Series: current issues in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, No. 65. The genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of paracetamol: a regulatory (re)view.

K Bergman1, L Müller, S W Teigen.   

Abstract

The publication of several studies reporting genotoxic effects of paracetamol, one of the world's most popular over-the-counter drugs, has raised the question of regulatory action. Paracetamol does not cause gene mutations, either in bacteria or in mammalian cells. There are, however, published data giving clear evidence that paracetamol causes chromosomal damage in vitro in mammalian cells at high concentrations and indicating that similar effects occur in vivo at high dosages. Available data point to three possible mechanisms of paracetamol-induced genotoxicity: (1) inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase; (2) increase in cytosolic and intranuclear Ca2+ levels; (3) DNA damage caused by NAPQI after glutathione depletion. All mechanisms involve dose thresholds. Studies of the relationship between genotoxicity and toxic effects in the rat (induction of micronuclei in rat bone marrow including dose-response relationship, biotransformation of paracetamol at different dosages, concomitant toxicity and biochemical markers) have recently been completed. These studies, which employed doses ranging from the dose resulting in human therapeutic peak plasma levels to highly toxic doses, give convincing evidence that genotoxic effects of paracetamol appear only at dosages inducing pronounced liver and bone marrow toxicity and that the threshold level for genotoxicity is not reached at therapeutic dosage. Reliable studies on the ability of paracetamol to affect germ cell DNA are not available. However, based on the amount of drug likely to reach germ cells and the evidence of thresholds, paracetamol is not expected to cause heritable damage in man. Various old and poorly designed long-term studies of paracetamol in the mouse and rat have given equivocal results. A few of these studies showed increased incidence of liver and bladder tumours at hepatotoxic doses. National Toxicology Program (U.S.A.) feeding studies have shown that paracetamol is non-carcinogenic when given at non-hepatotoxic doses up to 300 mg/kg/d to the rat and up to 1000 mg/kg/d to the mouse. Taking into account the knowledge of the hepatotoxicity and metabolism of paracetamol and the existence of thresholds for its genotoxicity, the animal studies do not indicate a carcinogenic potential at non-hepatotoxic dose levels. Based on this updated assessment of the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of paracetamol, it is concluded that there is no need for regulatory action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8600357     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00185-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  17 in total

Review 1.  Chronic kidney disease and cancer: a troubling connection.

Authors:  Benedicte Stengel
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Increased resistance to acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in mice lacking glutathione S-transferase Pi.

Authors:  C J Henderson; C R Wolf; N Kitteringham; H Powell; D Otto; B K Park
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and acetaminophen use and risk of adult myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Julie A Ross; Cindy K Blair; James R Cerhan; John T Soler; Betsy A Hirsch; Michelle A Roesler; Rodney R Higgins; Phuong L Nguyen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Long-term use of acetaminophen, aspirin, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of hematologic malignancies: results from the prospective Vitamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) study.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Filippo Milano; Theodore M Brasky; Emily White
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Comments on "DNA-binding activities of compounds acting as enzyme inhibitors, ion channel blockers and receptor binders."

Authors:  Hartmut Jaeschke
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.192

6.  Paracetamol and metabolite pharmacokinetics in infants.

Authors:  Caroline D van der Marel; Brian J Anderson; Richard A van Lingen; Nicholas H G Holford; Marien A L Pluim; Frank G A Jansman; John N van den Anker; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Biochemical effects of acetaminophen in aquatic species: edible clams Venerupis decussata and Venerupis philippinarum.

Authors:  S C Antunes; Rosa Freitas; E Figueira; Fernando Gonçalves; Bruno Nunes
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Associations of NSAID and paracetamol use with risk of primary liver cancer in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Authors:  Baiyu Yang; Jessica L Petrick; Jie Chen; Katrina Wilcox Hagberg; Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Barry I Graubard; Susan Jick; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Formation and characterization of covalent guanosine adducts with electrochemistry-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sabine Plattner; Robert Erb; Florian Pitterl; Hendrik-Jan Brouwer; Herbert Oberacher
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.205

10.  Successful drug development despite adverse preclinical findings part 2: examples.

Authors:  Robert A Ettlin; Junji Kuroda; Stephanie Plassmann; Makoto Hayashi; David E Prentice
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.