Literature DB >> 8600170

Morphological features and activation patterns of motor units.

R M Enoka1.   

Abstract

The force that a muscle exerts depends on which motor units have been recruited and at what rate they are discharging action potentials. Because of differences in motor-unit morphology (innervation ratio, average cross-sectional area, specific force, and geometric distribution of muscle fibers), the maximum motor-unit force within a motor-neuron pool is not constant but rather can vary by approximately 50 times. Consequently, muscle force is affected by which motor units have been activated. Similarly, the rate at which a motor neuron discharges action potentials depends on the pattern and quantity of the synaptic input it receives and its intrinsic frequency-current relation. The force that a single motor unit can exert will vary by approximately 3 to 15 times when discharge rate is increased from a minimum to a maximum. In the performance of voluntary contractions, therefore, humans appear to have an infinite number of combinations of motor-unit recruitment and discharge rate that can be used to vary muscle force. However, control strategies have evolved that reduce these options substantially. From experiments on low-force, isometric contractions, it appears that the recruitment order of motor units is relatively fixed and that muscle force is graded by concurrent variations in recruitment and discharge rate over much of the force range. Whereas the recruitment order of motor units appears to be robust in other tasks also, perhaps with the exception of lengthening contractions, the use of discharge rate to grade muscle force seems more variable. When subjected to acute and chronic challenges, motor-unit properties can adapt within limited ranges, and motor-unit discharge rate appears to be more affected than recruitment order, although the extent of recruitment may be affected by changes in use. Because movement is controlled by motor-unit activity, an understanding of motor-unit physiology can have a significant impact on the evaluation and treatment of movement disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8600170     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199511000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  32 in total

Review 1.  Surface electromyogram signal modelling.

Authors:  K C McGill
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The effect of an electronic control device on muscle injury as determined by creatine kinase enzyme.

Authors:  Donald M Dawes; Jeffrey D Ho; James D Sweeney; Erik J Lundin; Sebastian N Kunz; James R Miner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Scaling of sensorimotor control in terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Heather L More; John R Hutchinson; David F Collins; Douglas J Weber; Steven K H Aung; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Role of intrinsic properties in Drosophila motoneuron recruitment during fictive crawling.

Authors:  Jennifer E Schaefer; Jason W Worrell; Richard B Levine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 1--biological basis of maximal power production.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Michael R McGuigan; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Load knowledge reduces rapid force production and muscle activation during maximal-effort concentric lifts.

Authors:  J L Hernández-Davó; R Sabido; M Moya-Ramón; A J Blazevich
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans.

Authors:  A St Clair Gibson; T D Noakes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Impaired facilitation of motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Philipp Diehl; Uta Kliesch; Volker Dietz; Armin Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Neural drive to human genioglossus in obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Julian P Saboisky; Jane E Butler; David K McKenzie; Robert B Gorman; John A Trinder; David P White; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Corticospinal responses to sustained locomotor exercises: moving beyond single-joint studies of central fatigue.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.