Literature DB >> 8600155

Receptor-mediated effects on ligand availability influence relative mitogenic potencies of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha.

C C Reddy1, A Wells, D A Lauffenburger.   

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha) elicit quantitatively different cell proliferation responses even though they act via a common receptor, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We hypothesized that differential cellular trafficking of available ligand is responsible for the different mitogenic responses elicited by EGF and TGF alpha. Mitogenesis and ligand depletion were determined simultaneously in NR6 mouse fibroblasts expressing either wild-type (WT) or internalization-deficient cytoplasmic domain-truncated (c'973) EGFR. Thus we could determine the effects of both ligand-induced and low level constitutive ligand/receptor processing. For a given initial amount of growth factor, TGF alpha is a weaker stimulus than EGF in cells expressing either form of the EGFR. This difference in the mitogenic potencies correlates with increased depletion of TGF alpha observed during the growth assays. When this difference in ligand depletion is accounted for, or minimized, EGF and TGF alpha elicit quantitatively similar growth responses. Therefore, the relative mitogenic potencies of EGF and TGF alpha depend on ligand availability, as determined by the cellular trafficking of these ligands in conjunction with environmental circumstances. Interestingly, our data demonstrate that TGF alpha can be a less potent mitogenic stimulus than EGF under conditions where ligand availability is limited. Further, in our assays, differences in ligand processing are sufficient to explain the different mitogenic potencies of these growth factors in either of the receptor trafficking scenarios. Our results suggest a model of regulation of hormone responsiveness which favors dissociative ligands (such as TGF alpha) in receptor-limited situations and non-dissociative ligands (such as EGF) in the face of high receptor levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8600155     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199603)166:3<512::AID-JCP6>3.0.CO;2-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  22 in total

1.  Signal transduction networks in cancer: quantitative parameters influence network topology.

Authors:  David J Klinke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Endosomes: a legitimate platform for the signaling train.

Authors:  Jane E Murphy; Benjamin E Padilla; Burcu Hasdemir; Graeme S Cottrell; Nigel W Bunnett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  EGFR forms ligand-independent oligomers that are distinct from the active state.

Authors:  Patrick O Byrne; Kalina Hristova; Daniel J Leahy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Engineering Approaches to Study Cellular Decision Making.

Authors:  Pamela K Kreeger; Laura E Strong; Kristyn S Masters
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Comparative mitogenic potencies of EGF and TGF alpha and their dependence on receptor-limitation versus ligand-limitation.

Authors:  C C Reddy; A Wells; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Cellular level models as tools for cytokine design.

Authors:  Mala L Radhakrishnan; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

7.  Biophysical integration of effects of epidermal growth factor and fibronectin on fibroblast migration.

Authors:  G Maheshwari; A Wells; L G Griffith; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Differential endocytic routing of homo- and hetero-dimeric ErbB tyrosine kinases confers signaling superiority to receptor heterodimers.

Authors:  A E Lenferink; R Pinkas-Kramarski; M L van de Poll; M J van Vugt; L N Klapper; E Tzahar; H Waterman; M Sela; E J van Zoelen; Y Yarden
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  An integrated model of epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking and signal transduction.

Authors:  Haluk Resat; Jonathan A Ewald; David A Dixon; H Steven Wiley
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Transforming growth factor beta depletion is the primary determinant of Smad signaling kinetics.

Authors:  David C Clarke; Meredith L Brown; Richard A Erickson; Yigong Shi; Xuedong Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.