Literature DB >> 8600122

Auditory time-intensity cues in the binaural interaction component of the auditory evoked potentials.

D L McPherson1, A Starr.   

Abstract

Binaural interaction in the brainstem and middle latency auditory evoked potentials to intensity (dI) and timing differences (dT) between the two ears was studied in 10 normal hearing young adults. A component reflecting binaural interaction in the brainstem potentials occurred at approximately 7 ms and was of largest amplitude when dI and dT were 0. The latency of the binaural interaction component gradually shifted and its amplitude decreased as dI or dT increased and binaural interaction became undetectable when dI = 16 dB or when dT > or = 1.6 ms. In the middle latency potentials binaural interaction components peaking at 20, 32, and 45 ms were defined that were also largest when dI and dT = 0. The latency of the interaction did not shift with changes in dT and dI whereas the amplitude gradually decreased but binaural interaction components were still evident even at the largest values of dI (30 dB) and dT (3 ms). Psychophysical judgments of binaural perceptions showed binaural fusion of the stimuli to persist with dT values up to 1.6 ms and that lateralization of the intracranial image was complete when either dT = 1.6 ms or when dI = 16 dB. The results suggest that the presence of a binaural interaction component of auditory brainstem potentials correlates with the fusion of binaural click stimuli and the amplitude of the binaural interaction component correlates inversely with the degree of lateralization of the intracranial image. Binaural interaction components of middle latency potentials persist and continue to change even after the binaural stimuli cannot be fused.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8600122     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00134-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

Authors:  Won So; Spencer B Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Alexander T Ferber; Georg M Klump; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Alexander T Ferber; Victor Benichoux; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Aging effects on the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in the Mongolian gerbil: Effects of interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Geneviève Laumen; Daniel J Tollin; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Across Species "Natural Ablation" Reveals the Brainstem Source of a Noninvasive Biomarker of Binaural Hearing.

Authors:  Victor Benichoux; Alexander Ferber; Samuel Hunt; Ethan Hughes; Daniel Tollin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study.

Authors:  Morrison M Steel; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.

Authors:  Nicholas R Haywood; Jaime A Undurraga; Torsten Marquardt; David McAlpine
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.