Literature DB >> 8600014

Fracture toughness of water-aged resin composite restorative materials.

D J Indrani1, W D Cook, F Televantos, M J Tyas, J K Harcourt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of aging experimental dimethacrylate resin composites in water at 37 degrees C for periods up to 6 wk by measuring the variations in fracture toughness (K(c)), elastic modulus (E), fracture energy (G(c)), and water sorption.
METHODS: Six experimental resins were formulated from dimethacrylate resins, and were filled to 86 wt% (ca. 70 vol%) with treated inorganic filler to form six experimental composites. The fracture toughness was determined using a double torsion technique, the elastic modulus was measured in flexure, and the fracture energy was calculated from the fracture toughness and elastic modulus.
RESULTS: As a result of aging in water, K(c) and the G(c) increased, and the elastic modulus decreased, but all values approached a plateau near 6 wk. Water sorption also occurred during this period, mainly during the first 2 wk. SIGNIFICANCE: Variations in the mechanical properties are interpreted as being due to plasticization of the resin matrix by water, which appears to lower the yield stress and increase in the size of the plastic zone ahead of the crack, thereby causing the observed increase in G(c) and K(c). After approximately 6 wk, no further changes in properties occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8600014     DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80019-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  7 in total

1.  Interfacial degradation of adhesive composite restorations mediated by oral biofilms and mechanical challenge in an extracted tooth model of secondary caries.

Authors:  Carola A Carrera; Yuping Li; Ruoquiong Chen; Conrado Aparicio; Alex Fok; Joel Rudney
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  In vitro investigation of the performance of different restorative materials under cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Pospiech; Florian Nagel; Florian Gebhart; Frank P Nothdurft; Gergo Mitov
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Strong nanocomposites with Ca, PO(4), and F release for caries inhibition.

Authors:  H H K Xu; M D Weir; L Sun; J L Moreau; S Takagi; L C Chow; J M Antonucci
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Influence of the base and diluent monomer on network characteristics and mechanical properties of neat resin and composite materials.

Authors:  Nívea Regina de Godoy Fróes-Salgado; Vinícius Gajewski; Bárbara Pick Ornaghi; Carmem Silvia Costa Pfeifer; Marcia Margarete Meier; Tathy Aparecida Xavier; Roberto Ruggiero Braga
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 5.  Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials.

Authors:  J L Drummond
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days.

Authors:  M Sookhakiyan; S Tavana; Y Azarnia; R Bagheri
Journal:  J Dent Biomater       Date:  2017-03

7.  Effect of Two Different Surface Treatments on Retention of Cosmopost with Two Different Core Materials.

Authors:  Mohamed A Qudaih; Salah A Yousief; Mahmoud N M Allabban; Ali Abkar Mohammed Nejri; Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-03-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.