Literature DB >> 8598961

Pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in obese and normal-weight women: effects of gestational weight change.

L E Edwards1, W L Hellerstedt, I R Alton, M Story, J H Himes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pregnancy course and outcomes in obese and normal-weight women and their associations with gestational weight change.
METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression described the relation of weight change to pregnancy course and outcomes in a retrospective study of 683 obese and 660 normal-weight women who delivered singleton living neonates.
RESULTS: Compared with normal-weight women, obese women gained an average of 5 kg (11 lb) less during pregnancy and were more likely to lose or gain no weight (11% versus less than 1%). Obese women were significantly more likely to have pregnancy complications, but the incidence of complications was not associated with weight change. Compared with obese women who gained 7-11.5 kg (15-25 lb), obese women who lost or gained no weight were at higher risk for delivery of infants under 3000 g or small for gestational age infants, and those who gained more than 16 kg (35 lb) were at twice the risk for delivery of infants who were 4000 g or heavier.
CONCLUSION: Gestational weight change was not associated with pregnancy complications in obese or normal-weight women. To optimize fetal growth, weight gains of 7-11.5 kg (15-25 lb) for obese women and 11.5-16 kg (25-35 lb) for normal-weight women appear to be appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8598961     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00446-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  44 in total

1.  Racial differences in gestational weight gain and pregnancy-related hypertension.

Authors:  Jihong Liu; Alexa E Gallagher; Courtney M Carta; Myriam E Torres; Robert Moran; Sara Wilcox
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Changes in maternal characteristics in Nova Scotia, Canada from 1988 to 2001.

Authors:  Deshayne B Fell; K S Joseph; Linda Dodds; Alexander C Allen; Krista Jangaard; Michiel Van den Hof
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun

3.  Discordance in the assessment of prepregnancy weight status of adolescents: a comparison between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sex- and age-specific body mass index classification and the Institute of Medicine-based classification used for maternal weight gain guidelines.

Authors:  Isabel Diana Fernandez; Christine Marie Olson; Tim De Ver Dye
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2008-06

4.  Antenatal interventions for reducing weight in obese women for improving pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Christine M Furber; Linda McGowan; Peter Bower; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Siobhan Quenby; Tina Lavender
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011

5.  Nutritional assessment of pregnant adolescents: comparison of two popular classification systems.

Authors:  Janaina de Fátima Ávila Amaral; Guilherme Miranda Vasconcelos; Maria Regina Torloni; Mauro Fisberg; Isa de Pádua Cintra Sampaio; Cristina Aparecida Falbo Guazzelli
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Gestational weight gain in adolescents: a comparison to the new Institute of Medicine recommendations.

Authors:  I D Fernandez; C A Hoffmire; C M Olson
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women.

Authors:  J M Baeten; E A Bukusi; M Lambe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Systematic Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Aimed at Creating Gestational Weight Gain Charts.

Authors:  Corah O Ohadike; Leila Cheikh-Ismail; Eric O Ohuma; Francesca Giuliani; Deborah Bishop; Gilberto Kac; Fabien Puglia; Michael Maia-Schlüssel; Stephen H Kennedy; José Villar; Jane E Hirst
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Implications of the Institute of Medicine weight gain recommendations for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes in black and white women.

Authors:  L E Caulfield; R J Stoltzfus; F R Witter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The LIFESTYLE study: costs and effects of a structured lifestyle program in overweight and obese subfertile women to reduce the need for fertility treatment and improve reproductive outcome. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Meike A Q Mutsaerts; Henk Groen; Nancy C W ter Bogt; Johanna H T Bolster; Jolande A Land; Wanda J E Bemelmans; Walter K H Kuchenbecker; Peter G A Hompes; Nick S Macklon; Ronald P Stolk; Fulco van der Veen; Jacques W M Maas; Nicole F Klijn; Eugenie M Kaaijk; Gerrit J E Oosterhuis; Peter X J M Bouckaert; Jaap M Schierbeek; Yvonne M van Kasteren; Annemiek W Nap; Frank J Broekmans; Egbert A Brinkhuis; Carolien A M Koks; Jan M Burggraaff; Adrienne S Blankhart; Denise A M Perquin; Marie H Gerards; Robert J A B Mulder; Ed T C M Gondrie; Ben W J Mol; Annemieke Hoek
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.