OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the advantages and pitfalls of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure as applied to the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer precursors. METHODS: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure using local anesthesia and colposcopic guidance was performed in an outpatient clinical setting in 1189 consecutive patients referred for colposcopy for an abnormal Papanicolaou smear during a period of 4 years. RESULTS: Of the 1189 patients, 915 (77%) were managed in one sitting with the "see and treat" approach, and in 274 patients endocervical curettage and cervical biopsies preceded loop electrosurgical excision procedure. One hundred nineteen (10%) patients were lost to follow-up. Twenty-one patients had either adenocarcinoma in situ (15) or microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma (six) in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimen, whereas the electroexcised specimens contained no lesional tissue in 166 (14%) patients. Cure (ie, disease-free at 6 months or longer) was observed in 92% of the 883 evaluable patients after a single treatment and 95% after a repeat loop electrosurgical excision procedure. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion was successfully treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure in 287 (93%) of 309 patients. Complications, mainly intra- and postoperative bleeding, occurred in 7% of the patients. In most loop electrosurgical excision procedure-negative cases, the referral cytologic diagnosis or colposcopy and/or history were false-positive on review, or the biopsies performed before loop electrosurgical excision procedure removed smaller areas of abnormal tissue. CONCLUSION: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure using the see and treat approach should be limited to cytologically and colposcopically unequivocal intraepithelial lesions, and depth of excision should be controlled by colposcopy using loop electrodes of appropriate size. In doubtful cases, particularly in the young patient, disease should be ascertained by expert histology and colposcopy before definite therapy. Loop electroexcision represents an attractive means of diagnosing and treating cervical cancer precursors.
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the advantages and pitfalls of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure as applied to the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer precursors. METHODS: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure using local anesthesia and colposcopic guidance was performed in an outpatient clinical setting in 1189 consecutive patients referred for colposcopy for an abnormal Papanicolaou smear during a period of 4 years. RESULTS: Of the 1189 patients, 915 (77%) were managed in one sitting with the "see and treat" approach, and in 274 patients endocervical curettage and cervical biopsies preceded loop electrosurgical excision procedure. One hundred nineteen (10%) patients were lost to follow-up. Twenty-one patients had either adenocarcinoma in situ (15) or microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma (six) in the loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimen, whereas the electroexcised specimens contained no lesional tissue in 166 (14%) patients. Cure (ie, disease-free at 6 months or longer) was observed in 92% of the 883 evaluable patients after a single treatment and 95% after a repeat loop electrosurgical excision procedure. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion was successfully treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure in 287 (93%) of 309 patients. Complications, mainly intra- and postoperative bleeding, occurred in 7% of the patients. In most loop electrosurgical excision procedure-negative cases, the referral cytologic diagnosis or colposcopy and/or history were false-positive on review, or the biopsies performed before loop electrosurgical excision procedure removed smaller areas of abnormal tissue. CONCLUSION: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure using the see and treat approach should be limited to cytologically and colposcopically unequivocal intraepithelial lesions, and depth of excision should be controlled by colposcopy using loop electrodes of appropriate size. In doubtful cases, particularly in the young patient, disease should be ascertained by expert histology and colposcopy before definite therapy. Loop electroexcision represents an attractive means of diagnosing and treating cervical cancer precursors.
Authors: Aimée R Kreimer; Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Paula González; Robert D Burk; Carolina Porras; Mark E Sherman; Franklin Demuth; Li Cheung; Concepción Bratti; Ana Cecilia Rodríguez Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Simon Dufresne; Philippe Sauthier; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Patrick Petignat; Diane Provencher; Pierre Drouin; Philippe Gauthier; Marie-Josée Dupuis; Bertrand Michon; Stéphan Ouellet; Rachid Hadjeres; Alex Ferenczy; Eduardo L Franco; François Coutlée Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Cornelia L Trimble; Matthew P Morrow; Kimberly A Kraynyak; Xuefei Shen; Michael Dallas; Jian Yan; Lance Edwards; R Lamar Parker; Lynette Denny; Mary Giffear; Ami Shah Brown; Kathleen Marcozzi-Pierce; Divya Shah; Anna M Slager; Albert J Sylvester; Amir Khan; Kate E Broderick; Robert J Juba; Timothy A Herring; Jean Boyer; Jessica Lee; Niranjan Y Sardesai; David B Weiner; Mark L Bagarazzi Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L Stewart Massad; Mark Einstein; Evan Myers; Cosette M Wheeler; Nicolas Wentzensen; Diane Solomon Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 5.482