Literature DB >> 8598557

The feeding value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance.

B G Hammond1, J L Vicini, G F Hartnell, M W Naylor, C D Knight, E H Robinson, R L Fuchs, S R Padgette.   

Abstract

Animal feeding studies were conducted with rats, broiler chickens, catfish and dairy cows as part of a safety assessment program for a soybean variety genetically modified to tolerate in-season application of glyphosate. These studies were designed to compare the feeding value (wholesomeness) of two lines of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans (GTS) to the feeding value of the parental cultivar from which they were derived. Processed GTS meal was incorporated into the diets at the same concentrations as used commercially; diary cows were fed 10 g/100 g cracked soybeans in the diet, a level that is on the high end of what is normally fed commercially. In a separate study, laboratory rats were fed 5 and 10 g unprocessed soybean meal 100 g diet. The study durations were 4 wk (rats and dairy cows), 6 wk (broilers) and 10 wk (catfish). Growth, feed conversion (rats, catfish, broilers), fillet composition (catfish), and breast muscle and fat pad weights (broilers) were compared for animals fed the parental and GTS lines. Milk production, milk composition, rumen fermentation and nitrogen digestibility were also compared for dairy cows. In all studies, measured variables were similar for animals fed both GTS lines and the parental line, indicating that the feeding value of the two GTS lines is comparable to that of the parental line. These studies support detailed compositional analysis of the GTS seeds, which showed no meaningful differences between the parental and GTS lines in the concentrations of important nutrients and antinutrients. They also confirmed the results of other studies that demonstrated the safety of the introduced protein, a bacterial 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase from Agrobacterium sp. strain CP4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8598557     DOI: 10.1093/jn/126.3.717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  8 in total

1.  Facing up to Complexity: Implications for Our Social Experiments.

Authors:  Ronnie Hawkins
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Genetically modified foods: safety, risks and public concerns-a review.

Authors:  A S Bawa; K R Anilakumar
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Variability of CP4 EPSPS expression in genetically engineered soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill).

Authors:  Parimala Chinnadurai; Duška Stojšin; Kang Liu; Gregory E Frierdich; Kevin C Glenn; Tao Geng; Adam Schapaugh; Keguo Huang; Andrew E Deffenbaugh; Zi L Liu; Luis A Burzio
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  A comparative risk assessment of genetically engineered, mutagenic, and conventional wheat production systems.

Authors:  Robert K D Peterson; Leslie M Shama
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Safety assessment of leaf curl virus resistant tomato developed using viral derived sequences.

Authors:  Abinav K Singh; Shelly Praveen; Bhanu P Singh; Anupam Varma; Naveen Arora
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 6.  Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics.

Authors:  Koreen Ramessar; Ariadna Peremarti; Sonia Gómez-Galera; Shaista Naqvi; Marian Moralejo; Pilar Muñoz; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.145

7.  Risk assessment of a new bioinformatics evaluation of the insertion sites of genetically modified soybean event 40-3-2.

Authors:  Ewen Mullins; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Francisco Javier Moreno; Hanspeter Naegeli; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Tilemachos Goumperis; Tommaso Raffaello
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 8.  The use of whole food animal studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: limitations and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew Bartholomaeus; Wayne Parrott; Genevieve Bondy; Kate Walker
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.635

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.