Literature DB >> 8598407

Validity of using accumulated gas pressure readings to measure forage digestion in vitro: a comparison involving three forages.

P Schofield1, A N Pell.   

Abstract

Gas output from in vitro digestion of forage can be used to measure both forage digestibility and the kinetics of microbial digestion. Two different approaches are used to measure gas volumes: 1) either the gas is collected at atmospheric pressure and its volume determined directly, or 2) the gas accumulates in a fixed volume container, and the volume is calculated from pressure changes. We have used the latter technique to study the in vitro digestion of alfalfa, timothy, and corn silage by ruminal microorganisms in bottles of different sizes. We measured pH changes, NDF disappearance, and VFA concentrations and characterized the digestion profiles using a single- or dual-pool logistic model. Bottle size had a slight effect on pH but was not associated with changes in any of the other characteristics measured including the kinetic parameters. Gas measurements based on pressure increases in a fixed volume container appear to offer a valid alternative to methods based on gas collection at atmospheric pressure. We present an equation to adjust pressure sensor calibration values for use in different sized containers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8598407     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76850-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  2 in total

1.  Digestion kinetics of carbohydrate fractions of citrus by-products.

Authors:  Saman Lashkari; Akbar Taghizadeh
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 1.054

2.  Tracking the cellulolytic activity of Clostridium thermocellum biofilms.

Authors:  Alexandru Dumitrache; Gideon M Wolfaardt; David Grant Allen; Steven N Liss; Lee R Lynd
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 6.040

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.