Literature DB >> 8597916

Relating patient satisfaction to waiting time perceptions and expectations: the disconfirmation paradigm.

D A Thompson1, P R Yarnold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of patient satisfaction with waiting time perceptions and expectations.
METHODS: A random sample of patients seen at one community hospital ED during a one-year period was surveyed by telephone within two to four weeks of evaluation to determine perceived satisfaction and waiting time perceptions and expectations.
RESULTS: In response to 3,641 attempted phone surveys, 1,574 patients had usable interviews. Consistent with a hypothesis derived using the disconfirmation paradigm (i.e., that satisfaction is a function of the magnitude and direction of the difference between perceived service and expected service), the patients were least satisfied when waiting times were longer than expected, were relatively satisfied when waiting times were perceived as equal to expectations, and were highly satisfied when waiting times were shorter than expected (p < 0.0001). Overall, the measure of effect strength (values from 0 to 1) of perceived waiting time vs expectation on the patient satisfaction score was 0.32, indicating moderate association.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study supports the validity of the disconfirmation paradigm in relating patient satisfaction to waiting time perceptions and expectations. Furthermore, it emphasizes that achieving satisfaction in a service encounter necessitates that perceived performance meet or exceed patient expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8597916     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03150.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  23 in total

1.  [Analysis of patient waiting times in a polyclinic for surgery].

Authors:  C Meyer; A Ringler; D K Bartsch; V Fendrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  When Time is Not on Your Side: Patient Experiences with Waiting for Home Care and Admission to a Nursing or Residential Home.

Authors:  N Job A van Exel; Marion de Ruiter; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Physician-Centered Outcomes for Skin Cancer Treatment: A Single-Day Modified Delphi Process to Assess the Importance of Themes in Skin Cancer Management.

Authors:  Anthony M Rossi; Joseph Sobanko; Naomi Lawrence; Jeremy Bordeaux; Todd Cartee; Eric S Armbrecht; Anit Behera; Christian L Baum; Murad Alam; Ian A Maher
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Predicting patient satisfaction: a study of two emergency departments.

Authors:  P R Yarnold; E A Michelson; D A Thompson; S L Adams
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-12

5.  Assessment of general public satisfaction with public healthcare services in Kedah, Malaysia.

Authors:  Mohammed Azmi Hassali; Alian A Alrasheedy; Basyirah Afifah Ab Razak; Saleh Karamah Al-Tamimi; Fahad Saleem; Noman Ul Haq; Hisham Aljadhey
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-01-31

6.  Rationing in the emergency department: the good, the bad, and the unacceptable.

Authors:  E Cross; S Goodacre; A O'Cathain; J Arnold
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Orofacial pain: patient satisfaction and delay of urgent care.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Gregg H Gilbert; Marc W Heft
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Patient satisfaction in emergency medicine.

Authors:  C Taylor; J R Benger
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Outpatient experiences in acute hospitals.

Authors:  C De Brún; F Howell; D Bedford; R Corcoran; A Kelly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract surgery and length of time on the waiting list.

Authors:  B L Conner-Spady; S Sanmugasunderam; P Courtright; J J McGurran; T W Noseworthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.