Literature DB >> 8597777

Neither dosage nor serum levels of antiepileptic drugs are predictive for efficacy and adverse effects.

M W Lammers1, Y A Hekster, A Keyser, H van Lier, H Meinardi, W O Renier.   

Abstract

In order to assess whether doses or serum levels are predictive for the efficacy and adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), measures for exposure to drug combinations have to be used. For doses, the ratio of the observed prescribed daily dose (PDD) and the average defined daily dose (DDD) considered effective for the main indication of the drug was used. In analogy for serum levels, the OSL/ATL ratio, i.e. the ratio of the observed serum level and the average therapeutic level was used. In polypharmacy these ratios can be summed as the are normalized measures of strength. The correlations of these ratios with outcome measures were studied in 200 patients attending out-patient clinics of special centres for epilepsy; half of these patients were treated with monopharmacy and half with polypharmacy. As outcome measures the following indices were used: the index of seizures, which quantifies seizure type and frequency, the seizure activity index, the neurotoxicity score, the systemic toxicity score, and the composite index of impairments, which is the sum of the seizure activity index and the neurotoxicity score and the systemic toxicity score. When all data were pooled, the correlation coefficient between the PDD/DDD ratio and the OSL/ATL ratio was 0.77. However, when the data were examined separately for the monopharmacy and polypharmacy groups, the correlation was 0.31 for the monopharmacy group and 0.50 for the polypharmacy group. Neither the PDD/DDD ratio nor the OSL/ATL ratio correlated with the composite index of impairments or with any of the individual indices. Factors such as the difficulty of titrating the endpoint of seizure suppression and the development of tolerance to adverse drug effects may perhaps be responsible for these findings. This observational study signals the problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8597777     DOI: 10.1007/bf01870612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm World Sci        ISSN: 0928-1231


  10 in total

1.  Knowledge, attitude and practice in antiepileptic drug monitoring.

Authors:  J W Meijer
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand Suppl       Date:  1991

2.  A method of quantification for the evaluation of antiepileptic drug therapy.

Authors:  J A Cramer; D B Smith; R H Mattson; A V Delgado Escueta; J F Collins
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Rationale and clinical application of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  C E Pippenger
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 4.  Anticonvulsant drugs. An update.

Authors:  M J Eadie
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A prospective randomised trial on the effect of monitoring plasma anticonvulsant levels in epilepsy.

Authors:  W Fröscher; M Eichelbaum; R Gugler; G Hildenbrand; H Penin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Epilepsy treatment in The Netherlands. Comparison of two medical centres.

Authors:  D J Wijsman; M W Lammers; Y A Hekster; A Keyser; W O Renier; H Meinardi; H van Lier
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.209

7.  Epilepsy treatment in The Netherlands. Comparison of matched groups of two medical centres.

Authors:  M W Lammers; D J Wijsman; Y A Hekster; A Keyser; W O Renier; H Meinardi; H van Lier
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.209

8.  Clinimetrics and epilepsy care.

Authors:  D J Wijsman; Y A Hekster; A Keyser; W O Renier; H Meinardi
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1991-08-23

9.  Antiepileptic drug monitoring at the epilepsy clinic: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  J G Larkin; A L Herrick; G M McGuire; I W Percy-Robb; M J Brodie
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Clinimetric analysis of treatment objectives and clinical status: individualized treatment in epileptic patients.

Authors:  M W Lammers; Y A Hekster; A Keyser; H Meinardi; W O Renier; H Van Lier; D J Wijsman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.864

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Thirty years of clinical experience with carbamazepine in the treatment of bipolar illness: principles and practice.

Authors:  Robert M Post; Terence A Ketter; Thomas Uhde; James C Ballenger
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Correlation between prescribed daily dose, seizure freedom and defined daily dose in antiepileptic drug treatment.

Authors:  László Horváth; Klára Fekete; Sándor Márton; István Fekete
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-03-02

Review 3.  Quantitative Pharmaco-Electroencephalography in Antiepileptic Drug Research.

Authors:  Yvonne Höller; Christoph Helmstaedter; Klaus Lehnertz
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  Clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs: Systematic review.

Authors:  Zanab Al-Roubaie; Elena Guadagno; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Afsheen Q Khan; Kenneth A Myers
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2020-08

5.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antinociceptive effect of baclofen in mice.

Authors:  Graciela N Balerio; Modesto C Rubio
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.569

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.