Literature DB >> 8597519

Decreased angiotensin II receptors mediate decreased vascular response in hepatocellular cancer.

Y Wu1, P A Cahill, J V Sitzmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors' objective was to determine the origin of the diminished pressor responsiveness of angiotensin II infusion in hepatoma by evaluating angiotensin II receptor status in normal liver, hepatoma tumor, and cultured hepatocytes and H4IIE cells. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatocellular cancer is a highly vascular tumor, where the neovasculature is unique in that it arises only from the hepatic arterial circulation, whereas normal liver has both hepatic arterial and portal venous blood supply. The tumor neovasculature is also characterized by an abnormal vascular reactivity to vasoconstrictors, including the response to angiotensin II. The altered response of tumor vasculature to angiotensin II offers a potential therapeutic opportunity for modulation of tumor blood flow. However, the origin of the decreased vascular response is unknown.
METHODS: The authors evaluated the hepatic vascular response to angiotensin II infusion by determining hepatic arterial blood flow to normal liver and to tumor by means of radioactive microspheres. The angiotensin II receptor status in the normal liver, hepatoma tumor, and cultured hepatocytes and H4IIE cells was determined br radioligand binding analysis and in cryostat sections derived from normal liver and hepatoma tumor by means of in situ binding analysis with biotinylated angiotensin II.
RESULTS: Angiotensin II infusion decreased the hepatic arterial flow to normal liver and increased hepatoma to liver flow ratio. The number of angiotensin II receptors in normal liver was significantly higher than that in hepatoma (239 +/- 20 fmol/mg protein in normal liver vs. 162 +/- 15 fmol/mg protein in hepatoma) without a change in the affinity (4.4 +/- 0.8 nM in normal liver vs. 4.7 +/- 1.2 nM in hepatoma). H4IIE cells and primary hepatocytes had low receptor density. In situ binding analysis revealed that angiotensin II receptors were mainly on the smooth muscle cells of the neovasculature.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggests that the diminished vascular response to angiotensin II hepatoma may relate a loss of angiotensin II receptor on tumor neovasculature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8597519      PMCID: PMC1235101          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199602000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Characterization of the angiotensin II receptor in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. Evidence that a single population is coupled to two different responses.

Authors:  B Bouscarel; P F Blackmore; J H Exton
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Reference sample method for cardiac output and regional blood flow determinations in the rat.

Authors:  A B Malik; J E Kaplan; T M Saba
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Identification and characterization of the high affinity vascular angiotensin II receptor in rat mesenteric artery.

Authors:  S Gunther; M A Gimbrone; R W Alexander
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Suppression of endogenous avidin-binding activity in tissues and its relevance to biotin-avidin detection systems.

Authors:  G S Wood; R Warnke
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Changes in distribution of hepatic blood flow induced by intra-arterial infusion of angiotensin II in human hepatic cancer.

Authors:  Y Sasaki; S Imaoka; Y Hasegawa; S Nakano; O Ishikawa; H Ohigashi; K Taniguchi; H Koyama; T Iwanaga; T Terasawa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The effect of pregnancy on the angiotensin II pressor response in the rabbit.

Authors:  A D Berssenbrugge; T L Goodfriend; D L Ball; J H Rankin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A method for hepatic arterial perfusion studies in the rat.

Authors:  T T Than; J V Sitzmann; S S Li; P W Lin; L B Grochow
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Role of receptor cycling in the regulation of angiotensin II surface receptor number and angiotensin II uptake in rat vascular smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  M E Ullian; S L Linas
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Intra-arterial cis-platinum infusion with sodium thiosulfate protection and angiotensin II induced hypertension for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  S Onohara; H Kobayashi; Y Itoh; S Shinohara
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.990

View more
  3 in total

1.  Expression and clinical significance of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yun-Fei Duan; Xiao-Dong Li; Feng Zhu; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Angiotensin II increases gene expression after selective intra-arterial adenovirus delivery in a rabbit model assessed using in vivo SSTR2-based reporter imaging.

Authors:  Sheela P Singh; Murali K Ravoori; Katherine A Dixon; Lin Han; Sanjay Gupta; Rajesh Uthamanthil; Kenneth C Wright; Vikas Kundra
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.138

3.  Tumor-selective blood flow decrease induced by an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, temocapril hydrochloride.

Authors:  K Hori; S Saito; H Takahashi; H Sato; H Maeda; Y Sato
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.