Literature DB >> 8595687

Complications associated with removal of the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of removal in deeply anaesthetised versus awake patients.

P S Gataure1, I P Latto, S Rust.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the incidence of complications (coughing, biting, retching, vomiting, excessive salivation and airway obstruction) associated with removal of the laryngeal mask airway. The laryngeal mask airway was used in 100 adults undergoing urological procedures. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In 50 patients the laryngeal mask was removed by a nurse when the patient responded to commands in the recovery area. In the other 50 patients it was removed by the anaesthetist with the patient deeply anaesthetized in theatre. The majority of patients were elderly men who had relatively short procedures. The incidence of gastric regurgitation was assessed by measurement of pH of secretions at the tip of the laryngeal mask airway. Complications occurred more frequently in the awake patients (P < 0.01). Most were minor and occurred before removal of the laryngeal mask airway during emergence in the recovery room. Airway obstruction occurred in three patients in whom the laryngeal mask was removed in the recovery room. In two of these patients the oxygen saturation decreased below 80% and the other to 90%. No decrease in arterial oxygenation occurred in the anaesthetised patients in whom the laryngeal mask was removed by the anaesthetist. In 14 patients in the awake group the pH of secretions at the tip of the laryngeal mask was < or = 3 compared with only four patients in the anaesthetised group (P < 0.05). It is concluded that it may be safer to remove the laryngeal mask airway whilst the patients are deeply anaesthetised in the operating room than when they are awake in the recovery room.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8595687     DOI: 10.1007/BF03015098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  9 in total

1.  Effect of the laryngeal mask airway on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in patients during general anaesthesia.

Authors:  P G Rabey; P J Murphy; J A Langton; P Barker; D J Rowbotham
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Aspiration and the laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  N Koehli
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  The laryngeal mask airway. A study of 100 patients during spontaneous breathing.

Authors:  P M Brodrick; N R Webster; J F Nunn
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The laryngeal mask airway in children.

Authors:  D G Mason; R M Bingham
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Aspiration pneumonia and the laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  R M Griffin; I S Hatcher
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  The laryngeal mask--a new concept in airway management.

Authors:  A I Brain
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Regurgitation of gastric contents during general anaesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  P Barker; J A Langton; P J Murphy; D J Rowbotham
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Upper oesophageal sphincter pressure during inhalational anaesthesia.

Authors:  R G Vanner; B J Pryle; J P O'Dwyer; F Reynolds
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Vomiting and aspiration pneumonitis with the laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  G M Nanji; J R Maltby
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.063

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  [Negative pressure pulmonary edema. Post-obstructive lung edema after use of a laryngeal mask].

Authors:  K Sickmann; R Seider; M Dahm; H Nold
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Removal of the laryngeal mask airway in the post-anesthesia care unit. A means of process optimization?].

Authors:  K Goldmann; S Kuhlmann; M Gerlach; C Bornträger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Target controlled remifentanil infusion for smooth laryngeal mask airway removal during emergence from desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia.

Authors:  Derya Ozkan; Julide Ergil; Alp Alptekin; Nihan Aktürk; Haluk Gümüs
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Predicted EC₅₀ and EC₉₅ of Remifentanil for Smooth Removal of a Laryngeal Mask Airway Under Propofol Anesthesia.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoo; Hyun Jeong Kwak; Kyung Cheon Lee; Go Wun Kim; Jong Yeop Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil for inhibiting response to laryngeal mask airway removal during emergence.

Authors:  Sang-Jin Park; Jong-Yoon Baek; Jong-Yun Baek; Dae-Lim Jee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Comparison of the proseal, supreme, and i-gel SAD in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Sanli Mukadder; Begec Zekine; Kayhan Gulay Erdogan; Ozgul Ulku; Ucar Muharrem; Yologlu Saim; Durmus Mahmut
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-23

7.  Effect of removal of AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask in awake or deep anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ronald Ombaka; Vitalis Mung'ayi; David Nekyon; Samina Mir
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 8.  Early versus late removal of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Preethy J Mathew; Joseph L Mathew
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-10

9.  Removal of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adults Under Target-Controlled, Propofol-Fentanyl Infusion Anesthesia: Awake or Deep Anesthesia?

Authors:  Ren-Chih Huang; Nan-Kai Hung; Chueng-He Lu; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.