Literature DB >> 8594531

The effect of field of view size on steady-state pupil diameter.

P A Stanley1, A K Davies.   

Abstract

Studies of the relationship between luminance and pupil diameter have produced widely differing results. This research note explores the possibility that this is due, in part, to differences in the size of the adapting fields used by various workers. We present measurements of pupil diameter as a function of luminance for a variety of field subtenses. The results indicate a consistent trend for smaller subtenses to produce less pupil constriction. For field diameters of up to 25 degrees, replotting the data in terms of corneal flux density (i.e. the product of luminance and subtended area) causes an approximate convergence onto a single function described by D = 7.75-5.75 [(F/846)0.41/((F/846)0.41 / 2)] where D is the pupil diameter (mm) and F is the corneal flux density (cdm-2 deg2). This equation should be of some practical use in estimation of natural pupil diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8594531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  13 in total

1.  A system to measure the pupil response to steady lights in freely behaving mice.

Authors:  Mark Bushnell; Yumiko Umino; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Method for Adapting the Grayscale Standard Display Function to the Aging Eye.

Authors:  Giovanni Ramponi; Aldo Badano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Effect of stimulus size and luminance on the rod-, cone-, and melanopsin-mediated pupillary light reflex.

Authors:  Jason C Park; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effect of Age and Refractive Error on the Melanopsin Mediated Post-Illumination Pupil Response (PIPR).

Authors:  Prakash Adhikari; Candice A Pearson; Alexandra M Anderson; Andrew J Zele; Beatrix Feigl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prediction accuracy of L- and M-cone based human pupil light models.

Authors:  Babak Zandi; Julian Klabes; Tran Quoc Khanh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The significance of changes in pupil size during straylight measurement and with varying environmental illuminance.

Authors:  Sonia Gholami; Nicolaas J Reus; Thomas J T P van den Berg
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-11-12

Review 7.  Standards in Pupillography.

Authors:  Carina Kelbsch; Torsten Strasser; Yanjun Chen; Beatrix Feigl; Paul D Gamlin; Randy Kardon; Tobias Peters; Kathryn A Roecklein; Stuart R Steinhauer; Elemer Szabadi; Andrew J Zele; Helmut Wilhelm; Barbara J Wilhelm
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Deep learning-based pupil model predicts time and spectral dependent light responses.

Authors:  Babak Zandi; Tran Quoc Khanh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comment Concerning the Effects of Light Intensity on Melatonin Suppression in the Review "Light Modulation of Human Clocks, Wake, and Sleep" by A. Prayag et al.

Authors:  Peter Bracke; Eowyn Van de Putte; Wouter R Ryckaert
Journal:  Clocks Sleep       Date:  2021-02-10

10.  PupilEXT: Flexible Open-Source Platform for High-Resolution Pupillometry in Vision Research.

Authors:  Babak Zandi; Moritz Lode; Alexander Herzog; Georgios Sakas; Tran Quoc Khanh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.