Literature DB >> 8594246

Toward optimal laboratory use. Problems in laboratory testing in primary care.

P A Nutting1, D S Main, P M Fischer, T M Stull, M Pontious, M Seifert, D J Boone, S Holcomb.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequency and characteristics of problems in laboratory testing in primary care physicians's offices and their impact on health care.
DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study in which participating office-based primary care clinicians reported each occurrence of any laboratory incident during a 6-month study. Each identified problem was reported on a structured data collection instrument with an open-ended description of the problem.
SETTING: Primary care physicians' offices in North America. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-four primary care clinicians in 49 practices of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN). MAIN
RESULTS: A total of 180 problems were reported, yielding a crude rate of 1.1 problems per 1000 patient visits. Problems involving test ordering and specimen handling were the most common (56%), while those attributable to the test analysis itself accounted for 13% of the total. In the judgment of the practice staff, 27% of the reported problems had an impact on patient care. Of the 24 cases for which the specific impact was known and reported, half of the impacts were minor and about half were significant, as judged by whether or not the diagnosis and/or treatment of the patient was measurably affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinically apparent problems with laboratory testing in primary care were found at a rate of 1.1 problems per 1000 patient visits. Of the laboratory problems that occurred in this study, 27% were judged by the physician to have an effect on patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8594246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  7 in total

1.  Clinical impact associated with corrected results in clinical microbiology testing.

Authors:  Shan Yuan; Michael L Astion; Jeff Schapiro; Ajit P Limaye
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Quantitative assessment of prevalence of pre-analytical variables and their effect on coagulation assay. Can intervention improve patient safety?

Authors:  Ravi Bhushan; Arijit Sen
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-01-05

3.  Ambulatory care adverse events and preventable adverse events leading to a hospital admission.

Authors:  Donna M Woods; Eric J Thomas; Jane L Holl; Kevin B Weiss; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-04

4.  Algorithm-based arterial blood sampling recognition increasing safety in point-of-care diagnostics.

Authors:  Jörg Peter; Wilfried Klingert; Kathrin Klingert; Karolin Thiel; Daniel Wulff; Alfred Königsrainer; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Martin Schenk
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 5.  How to conduct External Quality Assessment Schemes for the pre-analytical phase?

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Kristin Moberg Aakre; Ann Helen Kristoffersen; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Test result communication in primary care: a survey of current practice.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Louise Bentham; Richard Lilford; Richard J McManus; Ann Hill; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  The common cold: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Dennis Wat
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.487

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.