Literature DB >> 8593881

Cellular and molecular effects of developmental exposure to diethylstilbestrol: implications for other environmental estrogens.

R Newbold1.   

Abstract

Concerns have been raised regarding the role of environmental and dietary estrogens as possible contributors to an increased incidence of various abnormalities in estrogen-target tissues of both sexes. These abnormalities include breast cancer, endometriosis, fibroids, and uterine adenocarcinoma in females, as well as alterations in sex differentiation, decreased sperm concentrations, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatic cancer, testicular cancer, and reproductive problems in males. Whether these concerns are valid remains to be determined; however, studies with the potent synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) suggest that exogenous estrogen exposure during critical stages of development can result in permanent cellular and molecular alterations in the exposed organism. These alterations manifest themselves in the female and male as structural, functional, or long-term pathological changes including neoplasia. Although DES has potent estrogenic activity, it may be used as a model compound to study the effects of weaker environmental estrogens, many of which may fit into the category of endocrine disruptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8593881      PMCID: PMC1518878          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.95103s783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  20 in total

1.  Post-stilbestrol secondary syndrome.

Authors:  W Pomerance
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Long-term effects on the female mouse genital tract associated with prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  J A McLachlan; R R Newbold; B C Bullock
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Female gene expression in the seminal vesicle of mice after prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  R R Newbold; B T Pentecost; S Yamashita; K Lum; J V Miller; P Nelson; J Blair; H Kong; C Teng; J A McLachlan
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Pathological changes in female C3H mice continuously fed diets containing diethylstilbestrol or 17beta--estradiol.

Authors:  B Highman; M J Norvell; T E Shellenberger
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct

5.  Follow-up study of male and female offspring of DES-exposed mothers.

Authors:  M Bibbo; W B Gill; F Azizi; R Blough; V S Fang; R L Rosenfield; G F Schumacher; K Sleeper; M G Sonek; G L Wied
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Vaginal adenosis and adenocarcinoma in mice exposed prenatally or neonatally to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  R R Newbold; J A McLachlan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Reduced fertility in female mice exposed transplacentally to diethylstilbestrol (DES).

Authors:  J A McLachlan; R R Newbold; H C Shah; M D Hogan; R L Dixon
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Diethylstilbestrol-induced upper genital tract abnormalities.

Authors:  A F Haney; C B Hammond; M R Soules; W T Creasman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Müllerian remnants of male mice exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  R R Newbold; B C Bullock; J A McLachlan
Journal:  Teratog Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  1987

10.  Lesions of the rete testis in mice exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  R R Newbold; B C Bullock; J A McLachlan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  45 in total

1.  Neonatal diethylstilbestrol exposure disrupts female reproductive tract structure/function via both direct and indirect mechanisms in the hamster.

Authors:  Imala D Alwis; Dulce M Maroni; Isabel R Hendry; Shyamal K Roy; Jeffrey V May; Wendell W Leavitt; William J Hendry
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 2.  A structural view of nuclear hormone receptor: endocrine disruptor interactions.

Authors:  Albane le Maire; William Bourguet; Patrick Balaguer
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Development of the human female reproductive tract.

Authors:  Gerald R Cunha; Stanley J Robboy; Takeshi Kurita; Dylan Isaacson; Joel Shen; Mei Cao; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.880

Review 4.  Endocrine disruptors and falling sperm counts: lessons learned or not!

Authors:  Stephen Safe
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Estrogenic chemicals in plastic and oral contraceptives disrupt development of the fetal mouse prostate and urethra.

Authors:  Barry G Timms; Kembra L Howdeshell; Lesley Barton; Sarahann Bradley; Catherine A Richter; Frederick S vom Saal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Tissue interactions and estrogenic response during human female fetal reproductive tract development.

Authors:  Gerald R Cunha; Takeshi Kurita; Mei Cao; Joel Shen; Paul S Cooke; Stanley J Robboy; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.880

Review 7.  Perinatal exposure to bisphenol A at the intersection of stress, anxiety, and depression.

Authors:  Kimberly R Wiersielis; Benjamin A Samuels; Troy A Roepke
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.763

8.  Cancer risk in DES daughters.

Authors:  Janneke Verloop; Flora E van Leeuwen; Theo J M Helmerhorst; Hester H van Boven; Matti A Rookus
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 9.  Epidemiology of Uterine Fibroids: From Menarche to Menopause.

Authors:  Lauren A Wise; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.190

10.  Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: the case of bisphenol A.

Authors:  John Peterson Myers; Frederick S vom Saal; Benson T Akingbemi; Koji Arizono; Scott Belcher; Theo Colborn; Ibrahim Chahoud; D Andrew Crain; Francesca Farabollini; Louis J Guillette; Terry Hassold; Shuk-mei Ho; Patricia A Hunt; Taisen Iguchi; Susan Jobling; Jun Kanno; Hans Laufer; Michele Marcus; John A McLachlan; Angel Nadal; Jörg Oehlmann; Nicolás Olea; Paola Palanza; Stefano Parmigiani; Beverly S Rubin; Gilbert Schoenfelder; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto; Chris E Talsness; Julia A Taylor; Laura N Vandenberg; John G Vandenbergh; Sarah Vogel; Cheryl S Watson; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.