Literature DB >> 8593521

Monoclonal anti-D specificity and Rh D structure: criteria for selection of monoclonal anti-D reagents for routine typing of patients and donors.

J Jones1, M L Scott, D Voak.   

Abstract

The Rh blood group system is the next most important to the ABO system in terms of its clinical significance in blood transfusion. It is vital to the safe, efficient practice of transfusion medicine that Rh D phenotyping tests are selected, executed and interpreted correctly. However, the Rh D blood group antigen has been shown to be subject to many phenotypic variations, and different reagents and typing techniques vary in their ability to detect these variants. The range of D-positive phenotypes are reviewed in terms of their reactivity with monoclonal antibody reagents and their clinical significance. In view of the available evidence, it is suggested that patient typing can be safely achieved by the duplicate use of one high-avidity or two very similar IgM monoclonal anti-D reagents that detect most variants except category DVI in simple tube or microplate saline tests. Antiglobulin testing for weak D should not be carried out on patient samples. Donor typing can be safely achieved by the use of the same monoclonal, used in parallel with a polyclonal anti-D reagent that detects DVI on sensitive automated equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8593521     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.1995.tb00225.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med        ISSN: 0958-7578            Impact factor:   2.019


  7 in total

1.  A simple diagnostic strategy for RhD typing in discrepant cases in the Indian population.

Authors:  Swati Kulkarni; Vasantha Kasiviswanathan; Kanjaksha Ghosh
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Characterization of the recombination hot spot involved in the genomic rearrangement leading to the hybrid D-CE-D gene in the D(VI) phenotype.

Authors:  G Matassi; B Chérif-Zahar; I Mouro; J P Cartron
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  It's time to phase in RHD genotyping for patients with a serologic weak D phenotype. College of American Pathologists Transfusion Medicine Resource Committee Work Group.

Authors:  S Gerald Sandler; Willy A Flegel; Connie M Westhoff; Gregory A Denomme; Meghan Delaney; Margaret A Keller; Susan T Johnson; Louis Katz; John T Queenan; Ralph R Vassallo; Clayton D Simon
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Enhanced opsonisation of Rhesus D-positive human red blood cells by recombinant polymeric immunoglobulin G anti-G antibodies.

Authors:  Dylana Díaz-Solano; Jaheli Fuenmayor; Ramon F Montaño
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Weak D prevalence among Indian blood donors.

Authors:  R N Makroo; Vimarsh Raina; Mohit Chowdhry; Aakanksha Bhatia; Richa Gupta; N L Rosamma
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2010-07

6.  Transfusion strategy for weak D Type 4.0 based on RHD alleles and RH haplotypes in Tunisia.

Authors:  Mouna Ouchari; Kshitij Srivastava; Houda Romdhane; Saloua Jemni Yacoub; Willy Albert Flegel
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Testing for Partial RhD with a D-Screen Diagast Kit in Moroccan Blood Donors with Weak D Expression.

Authors:  Z Kabiri; M Benajiba; K Hajjout; N Dakka; H Bellaoui
Journal:  J Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-10-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.