Literature DB >> 8592528

Effect of a copayment on use of the emergency department in a health maintenance organization.

J V Selby1, B H Fireman, B E Swain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of the emergency department for nonemergency care is frequent and costly. We studied the effect of a copayment on emergency department use in a group-model health maintenance organization (HMO).
METHODS: We examined the use of the emergency department in 1992 and 1993 by 30,276 subjects who ranged in age from 1 to 63 years at the start of the study and belonged to the Kaiser Permanente HMO in northern California. We assessed their use of various HMO services and their clinical outcomes before and after the introduction of a copayment of $25 to $35 for using the emergency department. This copayment group was compared with two randomly selected control groups not affected by the copayment. One control group, with 60,408 members, was matched for age, sex, and area of residence to the copayment group. The second, with 37,539 members, was matched for these factors and also for the type of employer.
RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and use of the emergency department in 1992, the decline in the number of visits in 1993 was 14.6 percentage points greater in the copayment group than in either control group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Visits for urgent care did not increase among subjects in any stratum defined by age and sex, and neither did the number of outpatient visits by adults and children. The decline in emergency visits for presenting conditions classified as "always an emergency" was small and not significant. For conditions classified as "often an emergency". "sometimes not an emergency", or "often not an emergency", the declines in the use of the emergency department were larger and statistically significant, and they increased with decreasing severity of the presenting condition. Although our ability to detect any adverse effects of the copayment was limited, there was no suggestion of excess adverse events in the copayment group, such as increases in mortality or in the number of potentially avoidable hospitalizations.
CONCLUSIONS: Among members of an HMO, the introduction of a small copayment for the use of the emergency department was associated with a decline of about 15 percent in the use of that department, mostly among patients with conditions considered likely not to present an emergency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8592528     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199603073341006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  48 in total

1.  Survey of directors of emergency departments in California on overcrowding.

Authors:  J R Richards; M L Navarro; R W Derlet
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-06

2.  The effect of the doctor-patient relationship on emergency department use among the elderly.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; G E Wright; L M Baldwin; L Chan; P Clitherow; F M Chen; L G Hart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study.

Authors:  John Hsu; Mary Price; Richard Brand; G Thomas Ray; Bruce Fireman; Joseph P Newhouse; Joseph V Selby
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sofie Rahman Morgan; Anna Marie Chang; Mahfood Alqatari; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Primary care: core values. Primary care in an imperfect market.

Authors:  J Roberts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-18

Review 6.  The cost of alternative models of care for primary care patients attending accident and emergency departments: a systematic review.

Authors:  G M Leydon; R Lawrenson; R Meakin; J A Roberts
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-03

7.  Impact of high-deductible insurance on adjuvant hormonal therapy use in breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Y Lu; Fang Zhang; Anita K Wagner; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Craig C Earle; Matthew Callahan; Robert LeCates; Xin Xu; Dennis Ross-Degnan; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Validation of an algorithm for categorizing the severity of hospital emergency department visits.

Authors:  Dustin W Ballard; Mary Price; Vicki Fung; Richard Brand; Mary E Reed; Bruce Fireman; Joseph P Newhouse; Joseph V Selby; John Hsu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  High-Deductible Insurance and Delay in Care for the Macrovascular Complications of Diabetes.

Authors:  J Frank Wharam; Christine Y Lu; Fang Zhang; Matthew Callahan; Xin Xu; Jamie Wallace; Stephen Soumerai; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Can broader diffusion of value-based insurance design increase benefits from US health care without increasing costs? Evidence from a computer simulation model.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Cynthia Omokaro; Amy C Justice; Kimberly Nucifora; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.