Literature DB >> 8592097

Tauroursodeoxycholic acid protects in vitro models of human colonic cancer cells from cytotoxic effects of hydrophobic bile acids.

L L Shekels1, J E Beste, S B Ho.   

Abstract

Bile acids have been implicated as tumor promoters that enhance epithelial proliferation and the development of colonic tumors. This study investigated the effects of bile acids on the growth of in vitro models of human colonic epithelial cells. Cell lines with varying degrees of differentiation (Caco2, HT29, LS174T, and Lovo) were studied. Cell viability and number were measured by a tetrazolium (MTT) spectrophotometric assay. Enhanced cell growth was not observed with any bile acid over the range 10 nmol/L to 2.5 mmol/L. Cytotoxicity was consistently observed at concentrations of unconjugated bile acids greater than 0.1 mmol/L. The bile acid concentration at which 50% growth inhibition occurred was similar for all cell lines and increased in the following order: deoxycholic acid = chenodeoxycholic acid < taurodeoxycholic acid < ursodeoxycholic acid < taurochenodeoxycholic acid < cholic acid < tauroursodeoxycholic acid. Coincubation of tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDC) with taurodeoxycholic acid (TDC) or taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TDCD) reversed the short-term (30-minute) cytotoxicity and release of glycoprotein induced by TDC or TCDC regardless of differentiation status. In contrast, TUDC did not reverse the cytotoxicity of deoxycholic acid. Unconjugated ursodeoxycholic acid did not alter short-term cytotoxicity of any bile acid. These data indicate that bile acids do not stimulate cell growth in undifferentiated or differentiated colon cancer cell lines, in contrast to normal colonic epithelium in vivo. Bile acid cytotoxicity correlates with the relative hydrophobicity of the bile acid. Because tauroursodeoxycholic acid alters the cytotoxicity of hydrophobic bile acids in vitro, further understanding of bile acid interactions in the colon may have important implications in altering tumor promotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8592097     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2143(96)90166-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lab Clin Med        ISSN: 0022-2143


  5 in total

1.  The cytotoxic effects of bile acids in crude bile on human pancreatic cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Y Lu; M Onda; E Uchida; S Yamamura; K Yanagi; A Matsushita; T Kobayashi; M Fukuhara; K Aida; T Tajiri
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Effects of bile acids on proliferation and ultrastructural alteration of pancreatic cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Zheng Wu; Yi Lü; Bo Wang; Chang Liu; Zuo-Ren Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The role of membrane cholesterol in determining bile acid cytotoxicity and cytoprotection of ursodeoxycholic acid.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Rand Doyen; Lenard M Lichtenberger
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-12-25

4.  Elevated Coefficient of Variation in Total Fecal Bile Acids Precedes Diagnosis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

Authors:  Shannon Knapp; Allysa Kehring; Jennifer Stepp; Christine M Calton; Sheila M Gephart; Sruti Bandlamuri; Kate E Boyle; Grey I Dietz; Haeley Johnson; Ryan E Romo; Mackenzie Spencer; Alan D Bedrick; Melissa D Halpern
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Ursodeoxycholic acid counteracts celecoxib in reduction of duodenal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bjorn W H van Heumen; Hennie M J Roelofs; M Elisa Vink-Börger; Evelien Dekker; Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen; Jan Dees; Jan J Koornstra; Alexandra M J Langers; Iris D Nagtegaal; Ellen Kampman; Wilbert H M Peters; Fokko M Nagengast
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.123

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.