Literature DB >> 8591372

Effects measured in the evaluation of automated information systems.

R P van der Loo1, E M van Gennip, A R Bakker, A Hasman, E F Rutten.   

Abstract

The results of a literature search show that most of the evaluation studies of automated information systems are dealing with structure measures. Only 15 of 91 studies investigated effects on the outcome of the care process. Probably one of the reasons for this lack of investigated "outcome" measures is the fact that many of the evaluated systems were not in routine use at the moment of evaluation. It is, however, possible to obtain indicators of outcome measures by investigating the relationship between process measures and outcome measures. In the context of many developments, such as the trend of increasing attention to the evaluation of outcomes of the care process and the increasing costs of health care, the effect of automated information systems on the outcome of the health care process becomes more and more important. In the attempts to develop guidelines for the evaluation of automated information systems, it is therefore important to pay attention to the relationship between process and outcome.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8591372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medinfo        ISSN: 1569-6332


  4 in total

1.  Location and Survival of Mycorrhiza Helper Pseudomonas fluorescens during Establishment of Ectomycorrhizal Symbiosis between Laccaria bicolor and Douglas Fir.

Authors:  P Frey-Klett; J C Pierrat; J Garbaye
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Damping-Off of Tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14.

Authors:  O Asaka; M Shoda
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Conjugative Transfer of Chromosomal Genes between Fluorescent Pseudomonads in the Rhizosphere of Wheat.

Authors:  J Troxler; P Azelvandre; M Zala; G Defago; D Haas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Tejal K Gandhi; Eric G Poon; Lisa P Newmark; Jonathan Ungar; Stuart Lipsitz; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.128

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.